Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums DSLR Video Getting into the DSLR scene

  • Getting into the DSLR scene

    Posted by Bernard Borg on December 16, 2011 at 11:18 pm

    Hi all

    I am sort of puzzled about which model I should go to

    I primarily want an slr to abbot video with basically for Tv Broadcasts but also festivals and feature documentaries
    I am aware that the best is the 5D mark ii being full frame but the model let’s put it this way is quite old now. Also a tad over budget

    What I was looking into was the 60d / 600d

    Please advice

    Also what about using 35mm glass i have some fast zuiko / zeiss primes are these good on an aps c sensor

    Please illuminate me

    Also another point what s this issue about hdmi monitoring dropping resolution whilst recording does this means it’s sense less buying a preview monitor seeing that you are not getting the proper image sometimes producers want to see the clarity and textures

    Deleted User replied 14 years, 4 months ago 5 Members · 11 Replies
  • 11 Replies
  • Chris Wright

    December 17, 2011 at 1:12 pm

    gh2 can output hdmi 24 inside a wrapped 60i without too much degradation and is cheaper than the 5D mark ii. the t2i quality jumps down to sd when rec button is hit and the lcd screen turns off, lol.
    and if you get a cheap SmallHD DP6 without zebras, the gh2’s got built in zebras anyways. mo savings = mo happy, right?

    gh2 fix as talked about here.

    https://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?237584-HDMI-Capture-Problem-SOLVED-AviSynth-RULES!

    and if you turn off intelligent resolution and -2 sat, -2 sharpness, the gh2 makes some mighty nice 24p filmic pans. you can hack it with ptool to actual look better than canon 5d mark ii!

    check it out on vimeo!
    https://vimeo.com/groups/gh2/videos/33819723

  • Bernard Borg

    December 17, 2011 at 1:46 pm

    What I’m worried about when it comes to the gh2 is the lenses and obviously the horrid crop factor of 2x that is already a pain to me my Olympus 510 and e3 pro

    I would like to hear more tough even on the canons 600d 60d

  • John Frey

    December 17, 2011 at 5:14 pm

    Our Panasonic Gh2 cameras had been our favorites until we purchased the just-released Sony SLT-A65. We have been testing it over the past 3 weeks and the results validate our purchase. Sony has used some new technology on this unit. It has a 24 megapixel APS-C sensor, implements the AVCHD 2.0 standard and will record stellar 1080 60p and 24p. It has a crop factor of 1.5, in-camera image stabilization, and will use all of the Sony and Minolta Alpha mount lenses. We picked up 4 additional excellent Minolta autofocus units via Craigslist locally for $150.00. This camera has an OLED viewfinder which is simply amazing – we do not have to use an add-on viewfinder loupe – it’s that good! Also, the articulating viewfinder is the best one that I have experienced on a DSLR. In addition, this camera takes great stills! We got ours from B&H for $900.00, which included a pretty good 18-55mm kit lens. This camera is a little bigger than our GH2s, which for us, is a plus.

    For an additional $500.00, you can purchase the slightly larger SLT-A77 which sports a weather-proof magnesium body, extra controls and several technical extras. Here is a link to a recent review.

    https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/sonyslta65/

    John D. Frey
    25 Year owner/operator of two California-based production studios.

    Digital West Video Productions of San Luis Obispo and Inland Images of Lake Elsinore

  • Bernard Borg

    December 17, 2011 at 10:32 pm

    Keep updating me please so I make an informed purchase to say it all I am impressed with the GH2 unhacked also the hacked is even better but stil unsure about the lens issue – surely the body doesnt matter because it will be all rigged up 🙂

    still no illumination about the canon or nikon range 🙂

  • Chris Wright

    December 18, 2011 at 1:48 am

    in video mode on the Sony SLT-A65, iso is maxed at 1600, compared to gh2’s 3200. also, a65’s AF mode in video is limited to F3.5.

    the video quality is slightly better than the 7d, i’ll give it that.

  • Bernard Borg

    December 18, 2011 at 8:35 am

    Basically I am getting that the gh2 is the best camera for movies or I am getting it wrongly ? Still not shure about the gh2 hack and what it achieves and the lens system for the GH2

    Also should I forget the 60d or the d7000?

  • Jorden Mosley

    December 18, 2011 at 5:47 pm

    Before I bought the GH2, I worried about the crop factor and lens as well. But once I got it, it became a non-issue.

    First, your not just limited to Panasonic lens. With the mount type of a gh2 (micro 4/3) its the most versatile mount out there. I’m currently using old Minolta AF lens with an adapter that has an aperture ring. The image quality is still great. We’re talking about lens’ that you could buy at a small fraction of the cost of modern lens. With an adapter you can mount so many variety of lens (new and old) from various manufacturers that you couldn’t on a Canon with an adapter. That alone has saved me thousands of dollars.

    Second, on paper the crop factor (1.6 vs 2.0) maybe be significant but in reality its not all that different. I got 28mm 2.8 (that’s a close 50mm equivalent)that I use the very rarely. What I mostly use a 50mm 1.7, 70-210 4.0, and 14-42mm (kit lens that comes with the gh2) to cover all the kinds of shots I need, whether it be close ups, medium, portraits, or wide angle.

    For a guy who was in your shoes not too long ago, I dodged a bullet in picking the gh2 over the 60D or T3i. For the work I do the very limited record time, moire, worst rolling shutter distortion, and cost of the lens would have forced me to get a gh2 down the road anyway.

  • John Frey

    December 18, 2011 at 6:16 pm

    I fully agree. Our GH2 cameras have been great, and we use a variety of Olympus and Nikon manual lenses with them. We bought the Sony A65 as we need 1080 60p to match our other cameras on an action sports project that will be highlighting Slomo. The GH2 only does 720 60p. I would not be overly concerned about very high ISO settings. In the real video world, you will be needing proper lighting gear, so keep that in mind when budgeting for support equipment.

    John D. Frey
    25 Year owner/operator of two California-based production studios.

    Digital West Video Productions of San Luis Obispo and Inland Images of Lake Elsinore

  • Deleted User

    December 18, 2011 at 11:36 pm

    The sensor in a GH2 is larger than most Micro Four Thirds cams, so when you switch the GH2’s aspect ratio setting (stills & video) the angle of view for the lens stays the same. So, for example, the angle of view of a 20mm m43 lens on a GH2 is the same whether the cam is in 16:9 aspect mode or 3:2 aspect mode. This is a great feature of the camera.

    Also, because the GH2’s sensor is “oversize”, when shooting HD video (16:9), the crop factor is x1.8, not x2.0, very similar to APS-C cams which typically have a x1.6 crop factor.

    There are plenty of wide angle lenses available for use with the GH2 & other m43 cams.

    I recently listed other nice capabilities of the GH2 in this post:
    https://forums.creativecow.net/readpost/280/7792

    Cheers.

    https://www.peterdv.com

  • Bernard Borg

    December 19, 2011 at 6:39 am

    So may I ask to get a clear picture of what are the specs
    Of the GH2 hacked and standard because im having trouble to get proper specs for comparison also if someone can give me a good idea on how the camera behaves with using old glass as generally the optics of 35mm cameras were finer than today’s

    Also what about pro res is really the gh 2 able to output 4:2:3 to an external recorder

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy