Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy Frame rate of video affected by composite mode.

  • Frame rate of video affected by composite mode.

    Posted by Renzo Reyes on August 26, 2010 at 4:54 pm

    Hello,

    I’m having a weird issue inside Final Cut. I’m working on a 1920x1080i 23.98fps square pixel Apple Pro Res 4444 sequence. All my assets are at 23.98 fps. I created a simple animation in AE, brought it into Final Cut an placed it on my timeline. So far so good. It plays back fine and smooth. But, when I set its composite mode to Overlay… every 2 frames it repeats the last frame… basically the playback on this clip becomes choppy….I really don’t understand why. If i go back to Normal composite mode then the playback is back to smooth. I made sure to render the timeline, maybe that was the issue… but no… checked the safe RT and Unlimited RT and no luck…. I even exported a quicktime using quicktime conversion and the same issue…
    Any ideas on why this?
    thanks

    Renzo Reyes

    Michael Gissing replied 15 years, 8 months ago 4 Members · 12 Replies
  • 12 Replies
  • Jeremy Garchow

    August 26, 2010 at 5:11 pm

    [Renzo Reyes] “All my assets are at 23.98 fps. I created a simple animation in AE”

    Make sure to specify 23.976 in AE, not 23.98. It makes a big difference.

    Jeremy

  • Renzo Reyes

    August 26, 2010 at 5:58 pm

    Thanks Jeremy. That actually did fix the problem. Who knew that going from 23.98 to 23.976 would fix it. Amazing.

    Thanks!

  • Jeremy Garchow

    August 26, 2010 at 8:45 pm

    [Dave LaRonde] “A newbie can think 23.98’s a real-live frame rate, and then it comes back to bite him or her.”

    Totally. That would mean adding a digit and 29.97 would become 29.970.

    I think the whole NTSC broadcast industry should standardize to even frame rates. How bout 24.0! 60.0! 30.0! 😉

    Jeremy

  • Jeremy Garchow

    August 26, 2010 at 9:48 pm

    [Dave LaRonde] “That can’t happen until everybody has all-digital receivers AND all-digital TV sets — no picture tubes. “

    And all cameras would need to be firmware updated everywhere, or simply thrown out and repurchased/remanufactured.

    Sounds like an economic stimulus plan to me.

  • Jeremy Garchow

    August 26, 2010 at 10:18 pm

    Aunt Bertha needed to get DTV anyway!

  • Michael Gissing

    August 26, 2010 at 10:43 pm

    Surely Jeremy, the answer is to standardise on 25 fps. After all most of the broadcast world uses this frame rate and it is a simple matter for cinemas to run digital projection at this rate.

    Death to decimal frame rates. Mind you a huge percentage of Cow posts will disappear overnight.

  • Jeremy Garchow

    August 27, 2010 at 12:05 am

    [Michael Gissing] “Surely Jeremy, the answer is to standardise on 25 fps.”

    Well, but of course! I’ll write a letter to the powers that be.

    [Michael Gissing] “Mind you a huge percentage of Cow posts will disappear overnight.”

    I woudl think there would just be new things to wrry about like, “I have a beta tape that’s 29.97, and need to get it 25. Help!”

    Jeremy

  • Jeremy Garchow

    August 27, 2010 at 3:04 pm

    [Dave LaRonde] “I want smoother motion than that.”

    It would be 50fps in 720p.

  • Jeremy Garchow

    August 27, 2010 at 3:20 pm

    [Dave LaRonde] “Not a whole lot of flexibility there.”

    If everything was shot at 25 or 50, it wouldn’t matter, which is Michael’s argument.

  • Jeremy Garchow

    August 27, 2010 at 3:37 pm

    [Dave LaRonde] “I wonder how this scene will play out if I shoot at 15 fps instead? Or maybe at 12?””

    And you think that will make for smoother motion? What? 🙂

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy