Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy Final Cut Pro + Mac Pro = Problems??

  • Final Cut Pro + Mac Pro = Problems??

    Posted by Nick Falangas on June 8, 2009 at 3:26 am

    I am about to buy a MacPro and I am upgrading from a:

    Imac 2.66ghz, Intel Core Duo, 4gbRAM and a ATI Radeon HD 2600 Pro

    Now here is what I am upgrading too:

    Mac Pro 2.26GHz 8-Core Intel Xeon
    Two 2.26GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon “Nehalem” processors
    6GB (6x1GB) of 1066MHz DDR3 ECC memory
    640GB Serial ATA 3Gb/s 7200 rpm
    18x SuperDrive (DVD±R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW)
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 with 512MB GDDR3 memory

    So after investigating I have read that FINAL CUT PRO can not use more than 4gb of ram and that people who have upgraded to a more powerful setup like that of above are being dissapointed because rendering times are not that much faster because of FCP issue of not being able to optimize the power of your mac pro

    Someone said wait for Snow Leopard… okay why? Final Cut Studio 3 is not coming any time soon? What will Snow Leopard do for me? FCP is still going to be capped at 4gb of ram

    The reason I am upset is because I need to upgrade computers pronto.. and the buying process and finding someone to talk to about this is such a pain in the butt. None of the genious’ in the mac stores have any idea about FCP not being able to optimize an 8core Mac Pro with all its power.

    And you know what about those using Premiere? You can buy a computer that is SUPPPER Fast for less than the MAC PRO and I am wondering where the RAM is capped in that situation? Anyway its not just about the RAM it is about me being able to Render something that was chroma keyed a lot faster.

    I am using 108080i from the XH-A1.

    I love Apple and I like many other editors are pissed. thanks for reading 😀

    (btw I am sure i could always make things faster by capture my footage and convert to 720 but I dont want to do that.)

    Dennis Radeke replied 17 years, 1 month ago 3 Members · 3 Replies
  • 3 Replies
  • David Roth weiss

    June 8, 2009 at 5:51 pm

    The new Mac Pros will render much faster than your iMac, period, end of story. And, you’re right, FCP isn’t multi-threaded, Compressor is the only app that currently uses the multiple procs and RAM in a way that is close to what the future will undoubtedly hold, whenever the future arrives. I would suggest that you head to your local Apple Store with a known project or file to render, and compare rendering times for yourself to see if spending the dough is worth it.

    David Roth Weiss
    Director/Editor
    David Weiss Productions, Inc.
    Los Angeles

    POST-PRODUCTION WITHOUT THE USUAL INSANITY ™

    A forum host of Creative COW’s Apple Final Cut Pro, Business & Marketing, and Indie Film & Documentary forums.

  • Nick Falangas

    June 8, 2009 at 8:00 pm

    Hi thank you for your response. I have another question. If I am buying a the 8 Core with Two 2.26 Ghz will FCP be able to use the total: 4.52 of Ghz my computer will contain? I mean, from what I am reading FCP only uses 1 core? What does that mean? Does that mean it is only able to use 2.26 Ghz? Sorry I know these are inexperienced questions. -Nick

  • Dennis Radeke

    June 11, 2009 at 10:32 am

    Premiere Pro is a multi-threaded application on both PC and Mac. I think you can address around 3.5GB of RAM per processor core. Meaning if you have an 8 core machine you could use over 20GB of RAM.

    I’m sure FCS3 will get you there but if you already have FCS2, buy the tower and get by until FCS3 is out. If you’ve got Adobe’s Production Premium suite, you can also give Premiere Pro a try through the FCP import function and test to see which renders faster.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy