Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Adobe After Effects Field selection when rendering movie

  • Field selection when rendering movie

    Posted by Mark Wesley on December 17, 2005 at 1:12 pm

    Hi.
    This should be obvious, but for the life of me, I can’t find the way to check which field preference is used in Project Settings or when making a movie. I can set it for PAL, but there does not appear to be a choice of upper or lower field. Frankly, I can’t see why there should be a choice, because as far as I know, all PAL systems use upper field first, but every other bit of software I use asks me to make a choice of upper or lower field. On AFX, is this chosen automatically when setting PAL, or is there a sub menu somewhere?

    Thanks for your help.
    Mark

    Enzo Tedeschi replied 20 years, 5 months ago 2 Members · 8 Replies
  • 8 Replies
  • Enzo Tedeschi

    December 17, 2005 at 11:11 pm

    I always check my field render order before rendering my comps. You can set it from your render queue.

    Quicktime PAL DV is lower field first, while some others use upper. Make sure you match your output gear, and you should be fine. When rendering for someone elses gear, I often use progressive if the content allows (supers, slower moves etc)

    Enzo Tedeschi
    ____________________________
    Editor
    Sydney, Australia

  • Mark Wesley

    December 19, 2005 at 9:50 am

    Hi Enzo.

    Thanks for your comments. Typically, shortly after posting my message, I discovered the little arrow with the drop down options, so I can now set field order. However, the news of the variability of PAL field order is very interesting. I wonder if the variations are listed somewhere? I do know that PAL broadcast here in Britian is upper field first and while it’s less of a problem when viewing on a computer, it sure makes a difference when watching on your basic domestic TV. Particularly with captions and graphics.

    Thanks for your help.
    Mark

  • Enzo Tedeschi

    December 19, 2005 at 12:47 pm

    Mark,

    I have seen a few lists posted around the web, but they seem to be full of inaccuracies. As I understand it, a lot of PAL codecs / formats are upper field first. DV seems to be an anomaly as lower. I may stand corrected on that. Avid uncompressed SD works in upper. It’s all over the place.

    I usually do a check when doing an FX shot for an unfamiliar project format. Most of the time, you will be affecting a digitised piece of footage, or creating a shot to be re-inserted into an existing sequence. A brief investigation will reveal the field order of what you are woking in, and just make sure you match your AE settings. You can’t really go wrong that way…

    And by all means, if you find that (correct) list, please post it here!

    Enzo Tedeschi
    ____________________________
    Editor
    Sydney, Australia

  • Mark Wesley

    December 19, 2005 at 1:03 pm

    Thanks Enzo.
    Sorry to continue to trouble you, but you mentioned that DV is generally lower field first. I shoot a lot of DVCAM. Bearing in mind the time relationship between the lower and upper field, in a PAL TX upper field first world, how do we get the lower field to appear correctly as the upper field without the reversed time order problem that might accur by using the ‘later’ DV upper field? Or is PAL DV actually upper field first anyway?

    Ive just read that paragraph though again and I think I know what I mean!! Do you?

    Mark

  • Enzo Tedeschi

    December 19, 2005 at 10:28 pm

    It’s no trouble – I’d like an answer myself!

    It would seem that the field order of digitised footage depends on the hardware used. Some capture cards are ordered upper-first, others are lower-first. Perhaps once this is played out as a video signal back to a deck, the order doesn’t matter as much as it does to have 50 fields for each PAL second? I’m just guessing, here, as all my googling seems to have come up with nada…

    I’ll keep searching!

    Enzo Tedeschi
    ____________________________
    Editor
    Sydney, Australia

  • Enzo Tedeschi

    December 20, 2005 at 1:25 am

    Mark,

    I posted the query on the Australian Screen Editors Guild forums, and here is a neat clarification:

    https://www.screeneditors.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1270

    Enzo Tedeschi
    ____________________________
    Editor
    Sydney, Australia

  • Mark Wesley

    December 20, 2005 at 1:03 pm

    Thanks Enzo
    You and your Australian colleagues have been a great help. I also have checked Google for info and came up with a Creative Cow link that seemed quite helpful:
    https://www.creativecow.net/show.php?forumid=1&page=/articles/onneweer_barend/deinterlacing/index.html

    My guess is you’ve seen this.

    The whole issue is rather like Russian Dolls where each new doll reveals its own version of clarity!!

    I’ve been racing ahead with my AFX skills, but have not been paying attention to the basics. I’ll take more care in the future. Once again, thanks for your help.

    Merry Christmas and Happy New Year
    Mark

  • Enzo Tedeschi

    December 20, 2005 at 8:45 pm

    Thanks, Mark. Yes I had seen this one. I was a little more preoccupied with finding out why there was a difference!

    It’s been a learning experience for us both!

    Have a great Christmas and a awesome ’06.

    Enzo Tedeschi
    ____________________________
    Editor
    Sydney, Australia

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy