-
field render vs. non
one of the main default export settings out of Motion i use is “Lossless + Alpha Movie”, and it is defaulted to non field render, so i made a new setting that is field rendered. i’ve rendered out the same project both ways and see no noticeable difference. am i crazy or shouldn’t a field rendered movie look a lot smoother (at least where images are moving) than a non field-rendered??
Thanks again!
J. Tad Newberry
Big Ya Productions
Mac Pro 2.66 GHz Quad-Core
3 GB RAM
http://www.bigya.tv -
1 Reply
-
Field render= interlaced. You would notice the difference much more on a TV. Personally I see no reason to ever use interlace render unless you’re integrating interlaced footage for an interlaced finish. Even then, interlaced animation can look iffy.
Noah
Check out my book: RED: The Ultimate Guide to Using the Revolutionary Camera!. Unlock the secrets of the 24p, HD and Final Cut Studio.
Now featuring the Sony EX1 Guidebook, Panasonic HVX200, and Panasonic DVX100.
https://www.callboxlive.com
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up