Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Adobe Premiere Pro Field problem

  • Field problem

    Posted by Ditha Angraini on September 21, 2007 at 2:32 am

    Hi, I’ve got this premiere pro 2.0 project (just a little over 30 minutes duration) and it was done using the Matrox preset. When I export to DVD, it’s very jaggy. I’ve checked all the field and they were all set to upper field, and I’ve checked all frame rate, etc and it’s all matched up. I’ve even played the movie on a different DVD player and burn several DVD and tried many other methods including importing the project into a standard preset, but it’s still all the same result. Can someone please tell me what has happened?

    For now what I’ve done was transfer the project onto DV tape and would re-import the captured video before burning to DVD and hope it works. But if there’s a shorter way and/or a way to prevent this from happening again, please let me know. I’d appreciate it very much.

    Thank you.

    Ditha Angraini replied 18 years, 7 months ago 3 Members · 6 Replies
  • 6 Replies
  • Mike Velte

    September 21, 2007 at 9:39 am

    Is motion slightly jerky? While playing in a standalone DVD player can you pause playback and then advance one frame at a time (my pause button does this)? Does the video advance as expected/
    You may have your fields reversed. Digital video worldwide is lower field first, although Matrox might be different.

  • Jeff Brown

    September 21, 2007 at 5:37 pm

    NTSC or PAL?
    what frame size (pixels) is your footage,
    what frame size is your project?

    -jeff

  • Ditha Angraini

    September 22, 2007 at 7:22 am

    The video is very jerky, and I don’t think my dvd player does that, I don’t think it has the slow motion function in it. Yup, usually I’d go with lower field first if it’s a normal/standard project, but this time I used the Matrox and it’s upper field first. However, I’ve tried on both lower and upper field, and both gave the same result.

  • Ditha Angraini

    September 22, 2007 at 7:22 am

    Heya, it’s PAL, and it’s 720×576 for both.

  • Jeff Brown

    September 24, 2007 at 12:46 pm

    Oh, sorry– I thought it might be an NTSC 480/486 issue. I don’t have a guess as to what would cause that in a PAL project.

    -jeff

  • Ditha Angraini

    September 24, 2007 at 11:20 pm

    That’s okay. Thank you for your respond 🙂

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy