Activity › Forums › Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy › Field dominance when bumping DV sequence to Uncompressed
-
Field dominance when bumping DV sequence to Uncompressed
Posted by Harry K. on March 23, 2006 at 5:45 pmWhen bumping up a sequence from DV to Uncompressed, I think Graham Nattress suggested to set the Sequence field dominance to NONE. But when I tried that, there were kind of double vision results on any motion within the shot. I’m using Nattress G Nicer to smooth color but that wasn’t the problem. When I changed the sequence setting to Lower, it was fine. Did I misunderstand Graham or could it be something else? Thanks for any feedback.
Harry K. replied 20 years, 1 month ago 7 Members · 9 Replies -
9 Replies
-
David Roth weiss
March 23, 2006 at 5:54 pmSince both DV and uncompressed SD are lower field dominant, I would hazard a guess that you misunderstood Graeme. But, you never know Grasshopper, Graeme has received “the knowledge,” and only he knows the secret way of the scan line.
-
Rick Dolishny
March 23, 2006 at 6:10 pmI think the problem is less a field order issue and a slight upconvert issue.
Remember DV is 720×480 and most SD cards expect a slightly different aspect ratio that translates to 720×486.
FCP will do a little conversion that looks fine most of the time but will yeild problems with some high motion and Livetype/Motion projects. That happened to me this weekend. A timeline I was working in was DV but my livetype projects were coming in from a SD template. Wierd field artifacting that went away when everything was resaved as ‘dv’.
Maybe that’s the problem or a step in the right direction.
– Rick
-
Jeremy Garchow
March 23, 2006 at 6:28 pmYou need to shove everything down a scan line if you are putting 720×486 animations into a 720×480 timeline.
Jeremy
-
Graeme Nattress
March 23, 2006 at 7:43 pmTimeline field order none only effects the animations you do in FCP using the motion tab. Both DV and SD are lower, but if you embed the 720×480 in a 720×486 timeline, there can be field order issues depending on which pixels are left blank at top and bottom.
Graeme
– http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP
-
David Roth weiss
March 23, 2006 at 8:59 pmAs I said, only you know the secret way of the scan line.
-
Bret Williams
March 23, 2006 at 9:11 pmThis is kinda scan line 101, but I don’t doubt the power G holds.
-
Alexander Gao
March 23, 2006 at 11:03 pmSo, how do you get around this trouble (make 720 x 480 WORK in a 720×486 project)?
Alexander Gao
“When the revolution happens, I’ll be leading it.”
-
Graeme Nattress
March 23, 2006 at 11:37 pmtwo black lines at the top, and 4 black lines at the bottom.
Graeme
– http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP
-
Harry K.
March 24, 2006 at 2:43 pmIs there any way to practically achieve this? In your opinion, is bumping up the sequence a viable
option to improve a piece with lots of subtitling?
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up