-
Feature documentary mixed codec and organization question.
I’m taking over a project where the rushes are all over the place in terms of codec and organization.
Hope the following makes some sort of sense.
Half of the original footage is MTS (but without the file structure required for L&T in FCP). Most of this has been converted already, to AIC. Obviously loads of the clips have the same filename i.e 00001.mov, which is frustrating.
The other half of the rushes all have unique filenames and are in the EXCAM codec.
What I’ve done so far is renamed the AIC clips in FCP with the reel number (or card #) as a prefix
i.e F1-00001.mov and then used the function in FCP to match the filenames to these new FCP clip names, so that It’s easier to know what I’m cutting and where it’s from.So, what I want to know I guess is should I re-transcode all the MTS stuff from scratch to match the EX rushes (which there are more of)? My problem is there’s limited disk space and this would take about three days to do, at least (There are 40 cards). I want to avoid doing this if possible.
My preference would be to mix the codecs I have already in the cut, and then when picture is locked, media manage the sequence all to EXCAM or whatever delivery format. Is the AIC quality sufficiently good to do this (it’ll be for broadcast), or would I need to go back to the MTS files, find whatever material I’ve used in the edit, transcode those clips with the new filenames, and then re-link?
The other half of my question is about organizing and making selects.
It’s an Ob Doc, so there is lots to go through. Would a good way to organize be to use markers on the master clips and mark different colours for different characters and narrative themes? And make notes in the master comment column for other bits of info?
Then make subslips from these markers and move the material into bins for these relevant themes/characters?
Would be really interested in seeing how other people would approach it.
Thanks in advance.
If you aren’t willing to change you shouldn’t be editing” – Richard Marks