Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro FCPX using all 32GB RAM during export

  • FCPX using all 32GB RAM during export

    Posted by Adam Chesbrough on August 12, 2014 at 9:31 pm

    Since I got FCPX back in the very beginning it would never come close to maxing out my RAM during export. Now it immediately bumps up to using all of it and only a small percentage of my CPU. When I export to youtube HD 1080 straight from FCPX the software crashes and says that my software has run out of RAM. I am running GTX670, i3930K (6 cores), and 32 GB of 1600Mhz RAM (which I just tested and pasted). I am going to assume that the mobo has no idea what is going on and is using my RAM at the wrong time in the wrong way.

    Exporting via FCPX is a CPU and GPU intensive task there is no reason why my RAM usuage should be exploding like this (I would understand if I was using photoshop or other adobe suites).

    Any thoughts, what are other experiences with a 6 core machine during export?

    Macbook Pro Retina: 2.6GHZ i7, 16GB RAM 1600MHz DDR3, GT 650M 1GB RAM

    Hackintosh (Sandy Bridge): i5 2500, 16GB 1333MHz DDR3, Nvidia GT640 2GB RAM

    OWC 4TB RAID0 (using esata)
    Tempo SATA Pro ExpressCard/34 (6Gb/s)
    Echo ExpressCard Pro Thunderbolt Adapter

    Adam Chesbrough replied 11 years, 9 months ago 3 Members · 18 Replies
  • 18 Replies
  • Robin S. kurz

    August 13, 2014 at 9:36 am

    Guess that’s one of the many “perks” of using a hackintosh. Have 6 and 8 core machines that don’t show any such symptoms.

  • Adam Chesbrough

    August 13, 2014 at 11:44 am

    That comment is not a helpful response. I have been using this machine for years with a hiccup until now and I can assure you that the issue is easily fixable with a little help from the fcpx community.

  • Robin S. kurz

    August 13, 2014 at 2:13 pm

    How is it not helpful? Your question was “… what are other experiences with a 6 core machine during export?”… which I answered. I’m even working with 5K RED material at the moment, transcoding, exporting, doing one-lights etc. and watched my usage and didn’t see anything go over maybe 10-12GB.

  • Adam Chesbrough

    August 13, 2014 at 2:36 pm

    Apologies. Just thought you were giving me a hard time for using a hackintosh without adding any insight. Good to know that this is far from normal. Going to install the new mobo, should get everything back to normal.

    Macbook Pro Retina: 2.6GHZ i7, 16GB RAM 1600MHz DDR3, GT 650M 1GB RAM

    Hackintosh (Sandy Bridge): i5 2500, 16GB 1333MHz DDR3, Nvidia GT640 2GB RAM

    OWC 4TB RAID0 (using esata)
    Tempo SATA Pro ExpressCard/34 (6Gb/s)
    Echo ExpressCard Pro Thunderbolt Adapter

  • Robin S. kurz

    August 13, 2014 at 3:00 pm

    Well, to be honest (and from personal experience), when running an “unqualified” machine one shouldn’t be surprised at odd occurrences that don’t happen otherwise. Tried hacks TWICE and the time spent with setting them up alone and then dealing with exactly this kind of inexplicable stuff never worked out to being in any way practical or worthwhile. Since then no one can tell me that Macs are “overpriced”, because they just plain aren’t. If anything, for a business, they’re the exact opposite.

  • Adam Chesbrough

    August 13, 2014 at 3:05 pm

    Well I disagree. This beast has been running like a dream for the past two years. It geek benches to 22k which equates to a 8-10k machine. So for those that dont have the budget and have the technical abilities to troubleshoot then hacks are the only way to get the performance.

    I’m glad you love your macs and you should support those that love their hacks. And that rhymes… which is just nice

    Macbook Pro Retina: 2.6GHZ i7, 16GB RAM 1600MHz DDR3, GT 650M 1GB RAM

    Hackintosh (Sandy Bridge): i5 2500, 16GB 1333MHz DDR3, Nvidia GT640 2GB RAM

    OWC 4TB RAID0 (using esata)
    Tempo SATA Pro ExpressCard/34 (6Gb/s)
    Echo ExpressCard Pro Thunderbolt Adapter

  • Robin S. kurz

    August 13, 2014 at 3:24 pm

    Well, for me, the (alleged) savings stand in no relation to the (also, relatively speaking, alleged) performance gain. Which actually aren’t that once you take issues e.g. like this into account. Of which there are (were) many. But hey… to each his own. 😉

    [adam chesbrough] “for those that dont have the budget and have the technical abilities to troubleshoot”

    A contradiction in terms if you ask me. Since, again from experience, if there’s anything you need to run (and keep running) a Hackintosh, then it’s extensive technical abilities. Certainly exponentially more than with a regular Mac.

  • Adam Chesbrough

    August 13, 2014 at 3:32 pm

    That “have” the technical abilities… This conversation is over we are both wasting our time. Let’s get back to work.

    Would love to see that 5k project you’re working on when it’s complete. Never worked with 5k. I’m sure its amazing

    Macbook Pro Retina: 2.6GHZ i7, 16GB RAM 1600MHz DDR3, GT 650M 1GB RAM

    Hackintosh (Sandy Bridge): i5 2500, 16GB 1333MHz DDR3, Nvidia GT640 2GB RAM

    OWC 4TB RAID0 (using esata)
    Tempo SATA Pro ExpressCard/34 (6Gb/s)
    Echo ExpressCard Pro Thunderbolt Adapter

  • Robin S. kurz

    August 13, 2014 at 3:35 pm

    Actually, it’s only 5K because the RED otherwise records cropped, not because it’s actually needed. And of course there’s nothing to be said against a little reframing freedom. 😉

  • Adam Chesbrough

    August 13, 2014 at 3:41 pm

    Lot to be said! Have fun

    Macbook Pro Retina: 2.6GHZ i7, 16GB RAM 1600MHz DDR3, GT 650M 1GB RAM

    Hackintosh (Sandy Bridge): i5 2500, 16GB 1333MHz DDR3, Nvidia GT640 2GB RAM

    OWC 4TB RAID0 (using esata)
    Tempo SATA Pro ExpressCard/34 (6Gb/s)
    Echo ExpressCard Pro Thunderbolt Adapter

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy