Activity › Forums › Creative Community Conversations › FCPX or Not…
-
FCPX or Not…
Posted by Sandy Shapiro on March 19, 2012 at 2:43 am…not. Hello Avid. Hello professional software.
Craig Seeman replied 14 years, 1 month ago 25 Members · 105 Replies -
105 Replies
-
Daniel Frome
March 19, 2012 at 11:58 amThat’s it folks. Close the debate forum. It has been solved.
-
Steve Connor
March 19, 2012 at 12:08 pmThanks for letting us know
Steve Connor
“FCPX Agitator”
Adrenalin Television -
Shane Ross
March 19, 2012 at 3:11 pm -
Mitch Ives
March 19, 2012 at 3:34 pmit’s brevity was impressive…
Mitch Ives
Insight Productions Corp.“Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.” – Winston Churchill
-
Craig Seeman
March 19, 2012 at 4:10 pm[sandy shapiro] “…not. Hello Avid. Hello professional software.”
FCPX Yes. Hello professional software.
12 years on Avid and there’s reasons why I wanted something different. A decade more has passed and looking at Avid, while it’s absolutely a top professional NLE, my reasons for leaving it behind haven’t changed.
FCPX, professional software . . . coming up from the “minors” is looking very professional.
-
David Cherniack
March 19, 2012 at 5:05 pm[Craig Seeman] “FCPX, professional software . . . coming up from the “minors” is looking very professional.”
In 3 to 4 years it may be ready for the show.
NLE’s are among the most complex applications in the entire software universe. They must do hundreds of different tasks in a multitude of different ways for a wide spectrum of users and uses.
No one has ever managed to develop one from scratch to maturity in less than five major cycles. And as been pointed out here, Apple is not exactly known for developing in house sophisticated applications from scratch.
Just for the point of view of NLE history the notion that FCPx is almost ready to play in the bigs is borderline delusional. But hey, Craig, that hasn’t stopped you so far 🙂
David
AllinOneFilms.com -
Craig Seeman
March 19, 2012 at 5:09 pmIt’s already being used in many professional environments including broadcast. Granted it has some severe limitations but “Professional” means many things to many people and people are certainly getting paid to use it and some of this work is used for broadcast. Motion is certainly “Professional” as well.
-
David Cherniack
March 19, 2012 at 5:58 pmHey Craig,
You used the baseball analogy, not me. Double A ball is also professional but it’s a long jump to the majors.
As has been stated here many times, beware analogies. They’re for poets and ponces.
David
AllinOneFilms.com -
Craig Seeman
March 19, 2012 at 6:08 pmSans analogy, if people make money using it, it’s professional.
If you want to use “broadcast” or “cable TV” as professional than it meets the needs of some in that market as well.
Actually if someone uses “professional” that opens the door, not the use of an analogy.
FCPX is certainly professional.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up