-
FCP vs iMovie – Effects and Transitions
Hi,
Just started working on a music festival documentary that I am editing with a friend in FCP.
He has been using iMovie for a few years and swears by its speed when it comes to creative effects driven editing. Although I admit, the word “creative” could be replaced with “cheesy” depending your perspective.
Anyway, I have explained to him the finer points of why FCP is a better program, but am tired of making excuses about why it lacks the effects power of iMovie. It’s ashame that FCP can’t borrow some of the best user friendly features of iMovie, most notably “EZ effects” and full screen preview mode.
Can someone here make a good argument why these features should not be included in FCP?
I understand that “professionals” don’t use cheap and easy effects in there work, and that “full screen preview” means output to a real monitor. But come on, wouldn’t it be great to have them included just to save time and hassle on occasion?
As far as FCP plugins; I have searched and found a few plugins here and there but nothing like the hundreds of creative canned effects that you can get for iMovie, and doesn’t offer the same user friendly fx gui.
Why do professionals resist some of the automated features that could make life so much easier?
Its hard to justify the hassle in rendering out video from FCP, jumping over to Motion or After Effects, creating the cheesy effect from scratch, outputting the video clip, and importing it back into FCP just to do it all over again. Even when all you want to do is a tiled mosaic zoom out, or a fairy dust star sprinkle. Compare this with the ease of doing the exact same function in iMovie?
To end I will reassure everyone that I do realize that iMovie is a HORRIBLE editing program and that the flexibility and power of FCP is amazing. It’s just can’t we have our cake and eat it too?
Rant off!