Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy FCP vs AfterEffects – importing Image Sequences

  • FCP vs AfterEffects – importing Image Sequences

    Posted by Michael North on August 22, 2008 at 11:44 pm

    Hi
    I’m thinking about upgrading to FCP studio or AfterEffects.
    I currently have FCExpress and I’m using the Trial of AE CS3.

    I’d like to think that if I got FCP I wouldn’t have to get AE
    But …
    FC-Express it a pain in the patience, when it comes to importing large image sequences.
    It seems to want to convert everything to Intermediate Codec (of something)
    before it lets me get to work.
    Even on my MacPro, I seem to spend way to much time watching the beach-ball after
    every single import …

    The Questions:
    1) Is FC-Pro the same way? (wait for everything to convert before I can work)
    If so … then AfterEffects starts to look like the way to go.
    But if FCP does not suffer from the kind of “wait time” that Express puts on everything … then
    the next question is …
    2) Will the combination of FCP and Motion
    make AfterEffects … redundant?

    Thanks

    Michael North replied 17 years, 9 months ago 2 Members · 4 Replies
  • 4 Replies
  • Walter Biscardi

    August 23, 2008 at 1:17 am

    These are two completely different products.

    Final Cut Express / Pro are video editing tools.

    After Effects is a digital composition / SFX / animation tool.

    What do you need to? Edit or create digital comps?

    Walter Biscardi, Jr.
    Biscardi Creative Media
    HD and SD Production for Broadcast and Independent Productions.

    STOP STARING AND START GRADING WITH APPLE COLOR Apple Color Training DVD available now!
    Read my Blog!
    View Walter Biscardi's profile on LinkedIn

  • Michael North

    August 23, 2008 at 4:33 am

    Thanks for the response.

    It seems to me that there’s a huge overlap.
    Especially if you add Motion 3 to the Mix.

    I would love to have them both … but that’s not feasible right now.

    It’s the delay after importing that I’m experiencing with FCExpress
    that has me hesitant about going to FCP instead of AF …

    I’m not totally sure what that delay is about
    and weather or not FCP/Motion has it too.
    -That’s- what I’m hopping to find out here …

    I need to bring in seven or eight tracks of Image Sequences,
    in 1920×1080 targa format from Lightwave; each about 7000 frames.

    Aftereffects can do it with out breaking a sweat.
    FCExpress can to it, if I take a lot of coffee breaks 🙂

    It seems like FCP/Motion should be able to do it
    unless they too go off to “conversion limbo” every time I import something big.

    Motion -is- a compositing program … right?
    And FCP can deal in multilayer tracks with alpha channels … right?

    It seems like the combination of those two programs
    should let me do anything that AE can do, with in reason.

    That’s -IF- they don’t make me wait while they convert everything I import
    into “intermediate Codec” or something …

    Help 🙂

  • Walter Biscardi

    August 23, 2008 at 10:49 am

    [Michael North] “It seems to me that there’s a huge overlap.
    Especially if you add Motion 3 to the Mix. “

    Again, now you’re adding a third application to the mix. Motion is a Motion Graphics Application and it is a standalone app. If you are talking After Effects vs. Studio 2, Studio 2 is much more versatile than the single application After Effects.

    [Michael North] “I need to bring in seven or eight tracks of Image Sequences,
    in 1920×1080 targa format from Lightwave; each about 7000 frames. “

    And you have properly set up FCE to import those image frames as 1 frame each, correct?

    FCE and FCP are video editing software, they are not optimized for image sequences so that portion of the application will be slow.

    [Michael North] “It seems like FCP/Motion should be able to do it
    unless they too go off to “conversion limbo” every time I import something big. “

    FCE is limited to a few formats so this is why it keeps converting everything. In FCP you would not have a conversion. I have never used FCE so I have no idea how many formats are available to you, but in FCP pretty much every format that AE handles, FCP can handle as well.

    [Michael North] “Motion -is- a compositing program … right?
    And FCP can deal in multilayer tracks with alpha channels … right?

    Motion is a Motion Graphics program with compositing features. Yes, FCP deals with alpha channels.

    Again, not really sure what you’re doing that you have to import the 7000 image sequence into a video project, but as someone who has used NLE editing software since 1993 and After Effects since 1997, they are nowhere’s near the same thing.

    Again, what do you need? A video editing tool or a composition tool?

    Walter Biscardi, Jr.
    Biscardi Creative Media
    HD and SD Production for Broadcast and Independent Productions.

    STOP STARING AND START GRADING WITH APPLE COLOR Apple Color Training DVD available now!
    Read my Blog!
    View Walter Biscardi's profile on LinkedIn

  • Michael North

    August 24, 2008 at 5:49 am

    You right! …. my bad
    I -am- thinking in terms of Studio 2 vs AfterEffects.
    I should have titled the post that way.

    In fact, all I really wanted to know was that FCP/Motion
    wouldn’t make me wait after every import …

    Yes … I set up the Image Sequences as one frame per frame 🙂 in FCExpress.
    After FCE does its song and dance upon import
    it composites fine …
    Except of corse there’s a small issue with 1920×1080 size frames.

    From the training videos on the Apple site it “appears” that Motion
    would deal with image sequences well …
    And in combination with FCP would make a good tag team.

    Aside from the size of the image sequences, my compositing needs
    are not -that- demanding. As long as FCP doesn’t coke on the files like FC-E
    the available effects should be more that enough. And when you throw in Motion,
    and the rest of Studio 2, I think it would be a bigger bang for the buck.

    And … I -do- have to edit video as well; mostly in preparation for use on cards within Lightwave.

    You’re right … neither FCP or Motion are sold as compositing programs.
    Apples compositor would be … Shake … right?
    I hung out with the Shake demo and hated everything about it 🙂

    I’m not a new to AfterEffects. I just have an old version (6.5)
    that doesn’t run well on that Mac Pro.
    So my choice is to upgrade to CS3 first.
    Or … upgrade to Studio 2 first.

    I’m I correct to assume that FCP can deal with ACVHD?
    iMovie deals with it on a Device level … but … this is perhaps better left for a different post.
    … after I do a little bit of searching on this great form.

    Thanks Walter … for your informed replies …

    Michael North

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy