Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy FCP Studio 2 & HD

  • FCP Studio 2 & HD

    Posted by Dan Mirolli on July 5, 2007 at 12:43 pm

    Shooting HD with a HDX900 (shooting HD 1080i, 24frames).
    Need to know how to ensure the pretty pictures the camera is producing are maintained throughout the process of editing in FCP Studio 2. We tried digitizing using the DVCpro HD codec and were not that thrilled. Would a card (Kona) give us better results ?

    thanks

    Walter Biscardi replied 18 years, 10 months ago 6 Members · 17 Replies
  • 17 Replies
  • Walter Biscardi

    July 5, 2007 at 1:00 pm

    [dan] “We tried digitizing using the DVCpro HD codec and were not that thrilled. Would a card (Kona) give us better results ?”

    Well, you’re shooting in the DVCPro HD codec so that’s what you have. If you’re looking at the output directly from the camera while you’re shooting, you’re seeing an uncompressed image from the camera head. When you watch that exact same image after recording to tape, you will see the DVCPro HD compression.

    I have edited / delivered in the neighborhood of 60 – 70 HD broadcast masters using the DVCPro HD workflow with material originated on the Varicam, HVX-200 and HDX-900. It holds up identical to working in the Uncompressed 8 or 10bit workflow. You can’t make the images look any better than what the raw tape is.

    If you’re not impressed with the DVCPro HD pictures, that’s a product of the cameras and the codec. The networks have told me we’re delivering some of the best HD programming they are getting. I’m capturing DVCPro HD via the Kona 3 and mastering back out to my 1400 deck in DVCPro HD.

    Walter Biscardi, Jr.
    https://www.biscardicreative.com
    HD Editorial & Animation for Broadcast and independent productions.

    All Things Apple Podcast! https://cowcast.creativecow.net/all_things_apple/index.html

    Read my blog! https://blogs.creativecow.net/WalterBiscardi

  • Ernie Santella

    July 5, 2007 at 1:13 pm

    Tell us what your not thrilled about? Could it be the settings on your 900? Anyone can easily make the camera look bad by tweeking the parameters. Noisy, bad color, sharpness etc. I’ve seen footage shot by other guys on a Varicam that looked horrible. I agree with Walter, so far, my 900 and editing at DVCProHD looks excellent. The codec doesn’t sound like your problem.

    Ernie Santella
    Santella Film/Video Productions
    http://www.santellaproductions.com

  • Dan Mirolli

    July 5, 2007 at 1:13 pm

    Thanks Walter . . . .The camera output looks great into a portable HD monitor. It’s in FCP that it looses something. I guess I’m asking this. What settings in FCP should I use to ensure the best outcome . . . .also, if a hardware card gives me more access (Pro Res ?) to better codeds . . which card and what codec. Sorry for all the questions, we are new to this.

  • Dan Mirolli

    July 5, 2007 at 1:15 pm

    Our settings were 1080-59.94i at 24p. I did not get into any internal settings beyond that.

  • Steve Connor

    July 5, 2007 at 1:21 pm

    Are you talking about the picture on the FCP viewer or do you have a broadcast monitor connected?

    Steve Connor
    Adrenalin Television

    Have you tried “Search Posts”? Enlightenment may be there.

  • Walter Biscardi

    July 5, 2007 at 1:23 pm

    [dan] “Thanks Walter . . . .The camera output looks great into a portable HD monitor. It’s in FCP that it looses something.”

    Are you looking at the SDI output of the camera while you are shooting OR are you looking at playback of the tape? Again, the output of the camera is Uncompressed. When it is recorded to tape, Compression is added. This is a very important thing to note.

    There is nothing lost in FCP in our experience so far with the DVCPro HD codec. What plays back off the tape is identical to what is recorded and mastered.

    It is NOT however the exact same quality as looking at the raw SDI feed off the camera before the image has been recorded to tape.

    Walter Biscardi, Jr.
    https://www.biscardicreative.com
    HD Editorial & Animation for Broadcast and independent productions.

    All Things Apple Podcast! https://cowcast.creativecow.net/all_things_apple/index.html

    Read my blog! https://blogs.creativecow.net/WalterBiscardi

  • Dan Mirolli

    July 5, 2007 at 1:27 pm

    Are you talking about the picture on the FCP viewer or do you have a broadcast monitor connected?

    Steve Connor
    Adrenalin Television

    Steve,

    I’m talking about on my workstation computer monitor (in the FCP viewer). We have broadcast monitors but they are not HD.

  • Dan Mirolli

    July 5, 2007 at 1:29 pm

    Walter,
    I’m in no way saying the video is not potentially great, I think though that we have some config issues and that is what I’m trying to clear up.

    Is there a way to down convert the video in FCP so we can use our SD monitors ?

    thanks,
    Dan

  • Steve Connor

    July 5, 2007 at 1:46 pm

    Dan,

    you cannot judge picture quality in any way by looking at the picture in the FCP screen, you HAVE to use an external HD monitor.

    Steve Connor
    Adrenalin Television

    Have you tried “Search Posts”? Enlightenment may be there.

  • Dan Mirolli

    July 5, 2007 at 2:12 pm

    I suspected that Steve. Just did a test and noticed that there is a huge difference (not better or worse) between 24p & 60i also.

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy