Activity › Forums › Creative Community Conversations › FCP/ Avid/ Premier for doc post producion houses?
-
FCP/ Avid/ Premier for doc post producion houses?
John Rofrano replied 11 years, 6 months ago 26 Members · 45 Replies
-
Robin S. kurz
October 24, 2014 at 3:53 pm[Jason Porthouse] “with a few more hoops to jump through if you’re going down the ProTools route for audio, or grading in a separate suite.”
Not the least bit more or less than with Avid in either case. One at best.
– RK
____________________________________________________
Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich! -
Bruce Rawlings
October 24, 2014 at 7:50 pmAs mentioned the final deliverable is the key to the correct answer. As a freelance editor I spend much of my time picking up the pieces created by wrong decision making. For some crazy reason people with low budgets spend a great deal of their budget trying to save money! Doesn’t leave a lot to do the job properly.
-
Timothy Auld
October 24, 2014 at 7:57 pmTo expand on the “no one cares what you cut on.” If you can deliver the content in the way the people who are paying you specify, they do not give a flying f*** what you cut it on.
Tim
-
Gary Huff
October 25, 2014 at 2:22 am[TImothy Auld] ” If you can deliver the content in the way the people who are paying you specify, they do not give a flying f*** what you cut it on.
“If you are trying to deliver a project to an editor to take it and run with it, then yes, in that situation, editors do give a f**k what it was cut on.
-
John Rofrano
October 26, 2014 at 11:50 am[tony west] “X is really user friendly and powerful. You might find that you can cut most of your doc yourself in it and then go to a more experience editor to finish it like you intended”
I have to agree with Tony. I edited with Vegas Pro for over 12 years (since Vegas Video 3) and I picked up FCP X in just a few days. It’s very similar to Vegas Pro and more powerful in a lot of ways (the magnetic timeline is pure genius. I will never edit with a track based NLE again). It shouldn’t be hard for you to learn it at all.
Having said that, did you think of posting to the Vegas Pro forum here at the COW? My friend Graham Bernard is in London and he’s an excellent Vegas Pro editor with the same 12+ years experience as me. He’s very active here at the COW on the Vegas Pro forum so you might want to contact him and keep everything in Vegas Pro. 😉 (no sense changing NLE’s if you don’t have to)
~jr
http://www.johnrofrano.com
http://www.vasst.com -
Redefined Media
October 27, 2014 at 3:08 amI use fcpx and i think that it is amazing and very user friendly. I think you can pick any software you like and put an add online to find a pro editor that uses that software
Redefined Media
-
Timothy Auld
October 27, 2014 at 5:04 pmThe comment was not about editors but those who are taking delivery (and making the rules.)
Tim
-
Walter Soyka
October 27, 2014 at 5:12 pm[TImothy Auld] “The comment was not about editors but those who are taking delivery (and making the rules.)”
In my little corner of the world, project files are considered a deliverable about half of the time, and you must use the client’s preferred system for the sake of their workflow.
Walter Soyka
Designer & Mad Scientist at Keen Live [link]
Motion Graphics, Widescreen Events, Presentation Design, and Consulting
@keenlive | RenderBreak [blog] | Profile [LinkedIn] -
Timothy Auld
October 27, 2014 at 5:46 pmAbsolutely agreed. But the other fifty percent don’t care what you cut on if you can satisfy their deliverables. So I guess that makes my “no one cares what you cut on” comment about fifty percent wrong.
Tim
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up