Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Motion “Falling Skies” title breakup

  • “Falling Skies” title breakup

    Posted by Tim Wilde on July 9, 2013 at 10:11 pm

    Any suggestions on how to achieve a rough approximation of the glitchy pixelated effect in the opening titles of FS?

    Sandeep Sajeev replied 13 years ago 4 Members · 18 Replies
  • 18 Replies
  • Stephen Smith

    July 10, 2013 at 2:39 pm

    I have never seen Falling Skies, is there a video of it you can post or can you post a link to somewhere like youtube?

    Stephen Smith – Follow me on Behance

    Utah Video Productions

    Check out my Motion Training DVD

    Check out my Vimeo page

  • Simon Ubsdell

    July 10, 2013 at 5:32 pm

    That looks as though it was done with lots of individual hand-made elements that are each used for one frame at a time to provide different kinds of break-up.

    So for example you’ve got a random pattern of black rectangles which pops on for the odd frame here and there.

    A similar random rectangular pattern is used as a mask for brightening or other color effects.

    Another mask is used for adding scaled and/or repositioned versions of the main image back over the top of itself in small chunks.

    And of course you’ve got the odd frame of TV glitch which you can easily add in Motion with the Bad TV filter.

    So basically you need to sit down for a few minutes and go crazy making elements like this then you then use to create your own pattern of glitches – it’s good to have quite little bursts of one type of interference pattern.

    It’s all about creating an interesting rhythm of interference events, albeit a random sort of rhythm.

    Or a much simpler way which would save you the making of the elements would be to just add one frame bursts of the Bad TV effect with different settings, again in a random rhythmic pattern.

    I hope that makes sense – this kind of sequence is really fun to do but as you can see it takes just a little time to get it looking as good as this.

    Simon Ubsdell
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • Simon Ubsdell

    July 10, 2013 at 6:15 pm

    And here’s another idea you can try in order to achieve the outgoing break-up that takes away the whole image.

    Add the Dots Out Random Replicator to your project. Change the Replicator Cell from the default circle to your own narrow rectangle shape.

    Then use this replicator as the source for an Image Mask of your entire master group.

    You’ll need to play around with the replicator settings to get the right look (and make sure it covers your image in its initial state) and shorten it right down so it only lasts a few frames but it can be quite effective and will save you a lot of work.

    You can also reverse it to use for the opening.

    Simon Ubsdell
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • Simon Ubsdell

    July 10, 2013 at 6:52 pm

    Here’s a quick test to show you some of those techniques in action:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFpQDVh6Rjw&feature=c4-overview&list=UU7c46tWEb2grLQ95OGLxBJQ

    Simon Ubsdell
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • Tim Wilde

    July 10, 2013 at 8:04 pm

    Excellent! Could you upload the project you created so I can see the details?

  • Simon Ubsdell

    July 10, 2013 at 8:10 pm

    Here you go (it’s Motion 5):

    6246_breakup.motn.zip

    As I say, it was a very quick and dirty test so the project is a right old mess!

    What I’d advise, if you want to use these techniques, is to pre-render a variety of elements and bring them back into a clean project, especially the replicator masks, as this will make it all much easier to handle.

    Hope it’s helpful.

    Simon Ubsdell
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • Tim Wilde

    July 10, 2013 at 10:53 pm

    Thank you. I’ll study your attachment this evening. I’ve been working with Motion for only a few days so pardon my ignorance.

    A promo email from MotionVFX arrived this afternoon, which prompted me to visit their site. There, I stumbled across this plug-in that seems to mostly duplicate Bad TV but also appears to include a hint the blocky artifacts you so astutely caught on to. IMHO, the latter are what differentiate the FS titles from the ubiquitous Bad TV effect.

  • Tim Wilde

    July 10, 2013 at 10:59 pm

    Thank you for replying. Here’s a link.

  • Simon Ubsdell

    July 11, 2013 at 8:44 am

    [Tim Wilde] “A promo email from MotionVFX arrived this afternoon, which prompted me to visit their site. There, I stumbled across this plug-in that seems to mostly duplicate Bad TV but also appears to include a hint the blocky artifacts you so astutely caught on to. IMHO, the latter are what differentiate the FS titles from the ubiquitous Bad TV effect.”

    I’m sure the MotionVFX plug-in is a good one – they do quality stuff generally. There are hundreds of glitch plug-ins out there right now – it’s an effect that’s in danger of being overexposed just like lens flares and light leaks.

    If you’re looking for a quick fix then a plug-in is the way to go – but it can be a lot more fun making this stuff yourself and you can create something genuinely unique rather than the off-the-shelf look that everybody else is using.

    Anyway, good luck with your project.

    Simon Ubsdell
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • Tim Wilde

    July 11, 2013 at 3:49 pm

    Simon, I agree wholeheartedly with the notion of devising effects on your own. If for no other reason, it’s a great way to truly learn and internalize Motion’s tools. Thank you very, very much for your help!

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy