Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Sony Cameras EX3 or HVX500

  • EX3 or HVX500

    Posted by Mario Biennarc sioco on March 9, 2010 at 3:02 pm

    Hi Guys, I need an honest answer from you. I hope you can help me decide which camera to get for our company. We have an EX1 and an EX3 and a NanoFlash. We are planning to get a third camera. Would you suggest to get an HVX-500 or stick with an EX3? What is the big edge on both cameras? If you were us, which one would you prefer, considering we do have a nanoflash at hand? In my opinion, I’m eyeing for the EX3 and getting an extra lens or a 35mm adapter kit(letus or brevis) with the money saved from getting the P2. Rather than getting a new P2 camera and spending more on other accessories. But is it worth getting the HVX-500? Would it be considered as an upgrade for us? Because I believe that having the Nanoflash makes the EX3 at par with the HVX-500, right? Hope to hear from you. Thanks.

    Mario Biennarc Sioco
    Videographer & Video Editor
    Gulf Broadcast
    Kingdom of Bahrain

    Mario Biennarc sioco replied 16 years, 2 months ago 3 Members · 3 Replies
  • 3 Replies
  • Michael Palmer

    March 9, 2010 at 3:12 pm

    The HPX-500 basically uses an older SD sensor system and interpolates the image to create HD. The EX series cameras use a full raster HD sensor system. You have 2 EX cameras, IMO you have made your choice. Another EX3 will give you the ability to jam timecode. Having all the same sensors is going to make it very easy to lock a look or picture profile between cameras, and only one person needs to know the system. P2 cards are pricey and I wouldn’t consider adding the P2 workflow to what you have.

    Good Luck
    Michael Palmer

  • Bo Skelmose

    March 9, 2010 at 10:52 pm

    I do not have a HPX-500 but a HVX-2100 and a EX3.
    They can be mixed but the EX3 makes better and sharper pictures than the 2100. I have severe problems with the 21oo that sometimes just not will start up and absolutely no problems with the EX 3. I have the 2100 because some cliens ask for P2 files.
    If you workflow is in your house, I would consider the PMW-350 EX camera for use with broadcast optics – this is my next choice of camera.

  • Mario Biennarc sioco

    March 10, 2010 at 5:51 am

    Thank you very much for your facts and insights. Here’s another question, how would you compare the CCD and CMOS of the 2 cameras? This has been the point of comparison when I defend myself in buying the EX3 instead of the P2. Does the HVX500 do better on low light conditions? Is there really a big advantage to with the P2’s CCD? Does it greatly affect the uncompressed SDI output of either camera?

    Mario Biennarc Sioco
    Videographer & Video Editor
    Gulf Broadcast
    Kingdom of Bahrain

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy