Activity › Forums › Creative Community Conversations › EVA1 and ProRes RAW
-
EVA1 and ProRes RAW
Posted by Oliver Peters on August 22, 2018 at 3:27 pmArticle with downloadable sample clips
– Oliver
Oliver Peters – oliverpeters.com
Oliver Peters replied 7 years, 10 months ago 6 Members · 19 Replies -
19 Replies
-
Bob Zelin
August 22, 2018 at 8:47 pmI have a client in Boston with an EVA1
they used to only use Adobe Premiere, but when they bought this camera, they always had stuttering issues with the EVA1 footage. They tried Resolve, and everything played back perfectly (QNAP system). Sorry everyone – they never tried FCP X. Anyway, they are one of my only ALL Davinci Resolve clients now, and this happened only because of the Panasonic EVA1.Bob Zelin
Bob Zelin
Rescue 1, Inc.
bobzelin@icloud.com -
Michael Gissing
August 22, 2018 at 11:54 pm[Bob Zellin]”Anyway, they are one of my only ALL Davinci Resolve clients now, and this happened only because of the Panasonic EVA1. ”
I wonder if they are disappointed that Resolve doesn’t handle ProResRAW. Grant Petty seemed a bit dismissive of the codec and it currently requires an external recorder so at this stage not a big deal. But I don’t get the impression other NLEs are rushing into ProRes RAW or is this an Apple issue trying to leverage an advantage for X by withholding it?
I really like the look of this camera and the dual ISO is a great idea. Interesting to hear Resolve works well with the onboard codecs. I would love a real world comparison of different compressed RAW codecs and baked codecs like ProRes and DNx but until there is a camera that can capture 15+stops that can also record a range of RAW and baked codecs to have that direct comparison its hard to know if this codec has any specific advantages other than file size compared to current 4:1 cDNG. The BM Ursa mini is able to do cDNG RAW at different levels of compression or uncompressed and ProRes/ DNx varieties onboard so it might be the first camera to offer that way of comparison that removes the camera variables if and when they offer ProResRAW onboard.
-
Oliver Peters
August 23, 2018 at 12:08 am[Michael Gissing] “But I don’t get the impression other NLEs are rushing into ProRes RAW or is this an Apple issue trying to leverage an advantage for X by withholding it?”
I don’t know this for a fact, but I suspect there’s a deal with Atomos for a limited time period to be able to record ProRes RAW. As far as decode/playback, we’ll see. Once it’s licensed to camera companies and other recorder companies then maybe it will be integrated into a codec package like the rest of the ProRes family. It’s not just NLEs. You can’t play a ProRes RAW file in QT Player either.
– Oliver
Oliver Peters – oliverpeters.com
-
Michael Gissing
August 23, 2018 at 12:39 amI had that impression too Oliver. BM and Apple have been best buds. Resolve was always first off the block when Apple changed their fcpxml format. BM cameras record many ProRes codecs except for RAW. Maybe the NLE developments in Resolve are starting to smart.
-
Shawn Miller
August 23, 2018 at 2:15 am[Michael Gissing] “The BM Ursa mini is able to do cDNG RAW at different levels of compression or uncompressed and ProRes/ DNx varieties onboard so it might be the first camera to offer that way of comparison that removes the camera variables if and when they offer ProResRAW onboard.”
The Ursa Mini doesn’t do DNx. BMD took it off the spec sheet earlier this year. ☹
Shawn
-
Mathieu Ghekiere
August 23, 2018 at 10:43 am[Oliver Peters] “I don’t know this for a fact, but I suspect there’s a deal with Atomos for a limited time period to be able to record ProRes RAW.”
I think it was in this interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DfFaNf796g ,
that the CEO of Atomos said they developed it together with Apple, and in return got a 6 month exclusivity deal.https://mathieughekiere.wordpress.com
Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.
-
Shawn Miller
August 23, 2018 at 2:35 pm[Michael Gissing] “Mine does. You have to format the CFAST card to ExFat.”
I always use eXFAT, but DNx is grayed out for me. What firmware version are you running and which Ursa Mini? I’m on the original UM4.6k.
Shawn
-
Michael Gissing
August 23, 2018 at 11:33 pm[Shawn Miller] “I always use eXFAT, but DNx is grayed out for me. What firmware version are you running and which Ursa Mini? I’m on the original UM4.6k.”
Same model as me. I’ll check and let you know. The camera has been on ProRes to match a long form doco I have been doing over the past three years. A friend borrowed the camera earlier this year and was shooting DNx I think after I updated to the latest software.
EDIT: Yes you’re right. That’s a shame. I updated to 4.8 a while back but the DNx job must have been before that. I was thinking of ditching ProRes on future jobs but I guess I’m stuck with it.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up