Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy eSATA performance?

  • eSATA performance?

    Posted by Tom Matthies on March 29, 2009 at 1:19 am

    As one of my external drives, I’m running an enclosure with a pair of SATA drives stripped together. I was getting performance that wasn’t very good with some DVCPro HD material. I ran the Kona disk whack test and I’m getting only around 70MB/sec. from the two drives. I get over 80MB/sec. from a single internal SATA drive. Does this sound right?
    I have a Firmtek enclosure with their dual channel eSATA card.I’m running the card in the top slot of a MacPro 2.8 Octo machine. Would the performance possibly improve if the card was in a different slot?
    Thanks,
    Tom

    Tom Matthies replied 17 years, 1 month ago 8 Members · 20 Replies
  • 20 Replies
  • Russell Lasson

    March 29, 2009 at 2:58 am

    You should probably be getting over 120MB/sec with two drives. Do you have them stripped as a RAID 0 or a RAID 1?

    -Russ

    Russell Lasson
    Universal Post
    Ridgeline Digital Cinema Mastering
    Salt Lake City, UT

  • Tom Matthies

    March 29, 2009 at 3:30 pm

    Raid 0. Two channel eSATA card with a control cable going to each drive separately. It just seems I should be getting throughput then this.
    Tom

  • Jeremy Doyle

    March 29, 2009 at 7:19 pm

    I have 2 samsung spinpoint 750g hard drives running software raid 0 in a OWC esata enclosure with each drive connected separately via a sonnet 4×4 and I’m getting writes of 170 and reads of 190 using the Kona test. And my raid is half full.

    So yeah, I think you should be getting better throughput.

  • Bob Zelin

    March 29, 2009 at 7:50 pm

    it is my opinion that your drives are full. I was one of the very early users of Firmtek 2 bay eSATA arrays, and even “in the old days” 2 Seagate drives stripped RAID 0 would give you 128Mb/sec. For you to be getting 70Mb/sec at RAID 0 – either your drives are full, or one of your drives are dying.

    Bob zelin

  • Chris Poisson

    March 29, 2009 at 8:34 pm

    Hey Tom,

    Bob is probably right about the drives being full, but I have a two banger Firmtec at RAID 0 on my MBP and I get about 125mbs with it. But it does have about 400 gigs of reee space on it, so maybe that’s the problem.

    Have a wonderful day.

  • Zane Barker

    March 29, 2009 at 9:30 pm

    Like others have said it may be because the drive is full, however if that is not the case then you may have a similar issue to one I recently had.

    I was experiencing slow performance on my two drive raid that I connect to my MacBook Pro. I ran the AJA test and my data rates were similar in speed to what you are getting. I decided to wipe the drive and start clean. When it failed to partition, I ran some tests on the drives individually and as it turns out one of the drives was having an issue and would not always respond. One drive not functioning properly would easily cause the issue. Replaced the two 500GB drives that I had with a pair of 1TB drives and the speed was back.

    So its possible that one or both of the drives may have a issue.

    There are no “technical solutions” to your “artistic problems”.
    Don’t let technology get in the way of your creativity!

  • Tom Matthies

    March 29, 2009 at 10:09 pm

    “Fullness” isn’t a problem in this case. I have two 500GB drives (Hitachi Server Class drives…the “good” ones)in a RAID 0 configuration. The drives are recent and the RAID is less than 25% full. Lots of space left on the platters. I regularly run Disk Warrior on all the drives. I have three other Hitachi drives (1TB) in the internal bays on the MacPro and the Aja test shows them to be only slightly faster coming in at around 85GB/sec. for an individual drive.
    Firmtek’s specs show that this configuration should be much faster.
    Still working on it…stand by.
    Tom

  • Tom Matthies

    March 29, 2009 at 10:49 pm

    I just updated the drivers and firmware on the card but It had no effect on the performance.
    Tom

  • Andrew Commiskey

    March 30, 2009 at 12:45 am

    Some drives are shipped with the jumpers set to 1.5 (SATA 1) instead of 3.0 (SATA 2) this setting could cause the problem.
    Drew

    Chaos is the beginning of everything.

  • Tom Matthies

    March 30, 2009 at 1:06 am

    I finally found the problem and it was good old fashioned pilot error. When I RAIDED the drive pair it appears that I mirrored them rather than stripping them. This would explain the slow read/write times. I copied everything from the RAID to a spare drive and created a new stripped RAID using the two drives. When I perform the Whack test now I’m getting over 120MB/sec. from the pair.
    My HD material is playing well now.
    Thanks to all and sorry for the goof up.
    Tom

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy