Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy Enlarging footage from 1080p/720p to retain detail in DVD output

  • Enlarging footage from 1080p/720p to retain detail in DVD output

    Posted by Jason Wang on April 5, 2013 at 9:05 pm

    Hello everyone,

    I’ll be shooting a dance recital in the next couple months with my DSLR’s and the ending product will be a 720×480 DVD.

    I know people have talked about the loss of quality/detail when down-converting HD resolutions down to DVD resolutions.

    My question is could I retain detail if I record the performance, not completely zoomed in, and then enlarge the HD footage in a 720×480 timeline thus cropping the footage and enlarging the dancers with no lose in detail?

    Seems like it might work in theory, but wanted to double check with everyone.

    Thanks in advance!

    – Jason

    Rafael Amador replied 13 years, 5 months ago 5 Members · 7 Replies
  • 7 Replies
  • Shane Ross

    April 5, 2013 at 10:08 pm

    I think it’d be worse to shoot wide, then use that in an SD timeline and zoom in. I really do. Shooting in HD and encoding for DVD will look a lot better than shooting/editing in SD and making a DVD.

    Seriously…do a test. You’ll see the quality will suffer greatly.

    Shane
    Little Frog Post
    Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def

  • Steve Eisen

    April 5, 2013 at 11:57 pm

    I’ll agree with Shane. In the future, when shooting 4K and above, shooting wide will give you better results. It will be a long time when we start shooting regularly in 4K.

    Steve Eisen
    Eisen Video Productions
    Vice President
    Chicago Creative Pro Users Group

  • Rafael Amador

    April 6, 2013 at 11:59 am

    [Jason Wang] “I know people have talked about the loss of quality/detail when down-converting HD resolutions down to DVD resolutions.”
    That depends very much of thetool you use for the downscaling.
    FC is not good at re-scaling, but with better software or a video card (AJA, Blackmagic), you won’t see degradation.
    rafael

  • Joseph Owens

    April 7, 2013 at 11:39 am

    Generally agree with slightly overshooting, for example, 4.5K for 4K, which allows for comfortable smoothing, stabilization, and scene-stitching. Too large a difference between the origination and delivery usually results in re-sampling errors, aliasing, and so on.

    jPo

    “I always pass on free advice — its never of any use to me” Oscar Wilde.

  • Jason Wang

    April 7, 2013 at 6:59 pm

    Thank you everyone for your thoughts and solutions.

    “I think it’d be worse to shoot wide, then use that in an SD timeline and zoom in”

    Sorry, shane, I wasn’t clear in my actual message, I’ll be shooting wide in 1080 or 720 and then enlarging that footage to zoom in on the dancers without losing detail on the DVD.

    But you’re right, I need to simulate the shoot and test it out.

    Thanks again everyone,

    – Jason

  • Shane Ross

    April 7, 2013 at 8:28 pm

    [Jason Wang] “Sorry, shane, I wasn’t clear in my actual message, I’ll be shooting wide in 1080 or 720 and then enlarging that footage to zoom in on the dancers without losing detail on the DVD.”

    I know EXACTLY what you mean. And I mean to tell you that HD on DVD looks better than SD on DVD. Do a test. HD compressed to DVD, and then HD on an SD timeline blown up so you can zoom in…on DVD.

    Shane
    Little Frog Post
    Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def

  • Rafael Amador

    April 8, 2013 at 11:13 am

    Jason,
    If you are shooting for a DVD, its makes no much sense to shoot 1080, unless you intend to pan or zoom..
    720 will let you reframe, if needed, and won’t force to make a big downscaling.
    rafael

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy