Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy encoding prores on macbook pro

  • encoding prores on macbook pro

    Posted by Luke Garza on March 5, 2008 at 9:54 pm

    I currently use a macbook pro for editing hdv and dv but want to make a switch to prores. I do not currently own a macpro or iohd. I want to capture to prores from my canon xh a1 or hv20 using the intensity pro card. I now its a PCIe card and does not go into a mbp but what about if i used a express card to PCIe card. I have looked at specs of the Lycom EK-108 specs of intenstiy pro and it seems to work spec wise together. My question is i know you need a intel mac to capture to prores but does that mean it has to be a quad or when they say intel would a mbp work. i know other companies like cineform use core duos and their codecs and say it is enough power to capture and encode in their codec but what about prores. Reason i ask is because this setup would cost less then 500 dollars instead of upgrading to macpro or iohd which both are many tiimes this cost. i would use a firewire 800 raid 0 to capture the media too. I know their is a firewire to prores now and could use that route but also would like the ability of live capture to stay in 422 instead of 420. Anyone have a clue or who to ask to find out

    Sean Oneil replied 18 years, 2 months ago 3 Members · 3 Replies
  • 3 Replies
  • Sean Oneil

    March 6, 2008 at 2:46 am

    It would probably work fine, but without testing it in real life you’ll never know. I don’t believe anyone has tested whether or not the dual-core of the MBP can handle HD ProRes. Just make sure you have the option to return whatever you buy in case it doesn’t work out.

    Having said that I think you are making a mistake. If you are working with HDV, you should capture and edit HDV natively. That is the superior workflow. And FCP 6 allows HDV footage that is not “cuts-only” to be rendered as ProRes. So it’s a lossless workflow.

    EDIT: I just re-read the end of your post, I see you want live capture. So like I said, it will probably work but the only way to know for sure is to test it yourself.

    Sean

  • David Roth weiss

    March 6, 2008 at 7:00 am

    The 4:2:0 of HDV is not nearly as bad as it sounds, and nothing at all like the 4:2:1 of DV that makes us all cringe. There is a white paper on the subject by a Sony engineer somewhere on the Web that you can Google.

    Personally, I really like workflow of capturing HDV directly to Pro Res via firewire.

    David Roth Weiss
    Director/Editor
    David Weiss Productions, Inc.
    Los Angeles

    POST-PRODUCTION WITHOUT THE USUAL INSANITY ™

    A forum host of Creative COW’s Business & Marketing, and Indie Film & Documentary forums.

  • Sean Oneil

    March 7, 2008 at 3:23 am

    It’s not just the colorspace. HDV is extremely lossy. Capturing the raw uncompressed feed – there’s a lot to be said for that.

    Sean

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy