Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy Electronic Makeup Artist or Beauty Box?

  • Electronic Makeup Artist or Beauty Box?

    Posted by Bob Cole on March 4, 2010 at 2:35 am

    As a way to do my part in the eternal struggle to make people look like movie stars (and keep clients happy), I would like to use either Electronic Makeup Artist (Sheffield) or Beauty Box (Digital Anarchy), or even some other filter.

    If someone out there has actually tried both, and has an opinion, I’d love to hear it.

    Thanks!

    Bob C

    Jim Tierney replied 16 years, 3 months ago 5 Members · 8 Replies
  • 8 Replies
  • Shane Ross

    March 4, 2010 at 3:39 am

    Beauty Box does a SLIGHTLY better job, but EMA still does a great job. There are demo’s for both, download and test. That’s how I knew.

    Then check out the render times. 10 seconds with EMA takes 35-40 seconds to render, and 3.5 min for Beauty Box to render. If you have a LOT of stuff, then the render will take all night, PLUS!

    Shane

    GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
    Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def

  • Doug Gilmore

    March 4, 2010 at 4:05 pm

    EMA is miraculous. Using it has amazed clients. The default settings are a great starting point and once you start playing around with it you will find your own sweet spots for various client needs.

    I cannot comment on Beauty Box because I’ve never used it…ever needed to us it, cause EMA does everything I need and more.

  • Jim Tierney

    March 4, 2010 at 7:46 pm

    Just an fyi, regarding Beauty Box speed…

    We’re working on a GPU-optimized update that should be available around NAB (April). It’ll be a free update and should improve the render times significantly.

    cheers,
    Jim
    ————
    Jim Tierney
    Digital Anarchy

  • Jerry Hofmann

    March 6, 2010 at 3:20 pm

    I used Electronic Makeup Artist in a project a while back that made the woman I used it on cry. She told me that she hadn’t looked that good in 15 years… it works man. It’s magic.

    Jerry

    Apple Certified Trainer, Producer, Writer, Director Editor, Gun for Hire and other things. I ski.

    8-Core 3.0 Intel Mac Pro, Dual 2 gig G5, AJA Kona SD, AJA Kona 2, Huge Systems Array UL3D, AJA Io HD, 17″ MBP, Matrox MXO2 with MAX Cinema Displays

  • Bob Cole

    March 6, 2010 at 3:26 pm

    [Jerry Hofmann] “She told me that she hadn’t looked that good in 15 years… it works man. It’s magic.”

    That’s it, then, Jerry.

    I’m gonna get it and use on myself.

    Bob C

  • Bob Cole

    March 6, 2010 at 4:01 pm

    One more candidate: Re:Vision Effects SmoothKit. Would this work as well as EMA/BB?

  • Jerry Hofmann

    March 6, 2010 at 11:31 pm

    I only wish…

    I do like it though and it’s very easy to use. I’m doing some DVD’s for the COW and I’m gonna use it on myself… too bad it doesn’t remove BAGS under the eyes, it minimizes any color difference. But Preparation H shrinks the bags… LOL. The models I worked with over the years told me about that little trick. It really does work too.

    Jerry

    Apple Certified Trainer, Producer, Writer, Director Editor, Gun for Hire and other things. I ski.

    8-Core 3.0 Intel Mac Pro, Dual 2 gig G5, AJA Kona SD, AJA Kona 2, Huge Systems Array UL3D, AJA Io HD, 17″ MBP, Matrox MXO2 with MAX Cinema Displays

  • Jim Tierney

    March 7, 2010 at 3:16 am

    Bob,

    I’d recommend downloading the demos of all three and trying them. All three products have free trials, so you can see the results on your footage and how intuitive it is to use each of them.

    cheers,
    Jim Tierney
    Digital Anarchy

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy