Mark,
About a year and a half ago I was faced with the same decision. Spend $35K on digibeta, or about $13K on DVCPRO-50. After talking with several people, I took a chance and went with DVCPRO-50 for my main SD mastering deck. After I got the deck, I did some really geeky difference matte tests (like Marco Solario does on his codec sight) to test stuff that had previously been mastered to digibeta and compared the same thing mastered to DV50. There is about a 10% difference in favor of digibeta. You can do the math and see that the difference in cost is far greater. I also compared footage that had originated on film, been mastered to digibeta and loaded into my system at 10-bit uncompressed (via SDI) with the same footage output to DV50 and loaded back into the system. I put the stuff that had gone through the DV50 deck into an after effects timeline on top of the footage that had not gone through the deck and turned the top layer off and on to see if I could visually see a difference. I had to blow the stuff up about 800% to see any pixels moving around.
So the short answer is, go with DV50, you’ll never see the difference. Digibeta may be slightly less compressed, but the algorithm that it uses is aging, whereas the DV50 codec is newer and apparently more effecient.
Chris Tomberlin
OutPost Pictures
Chris Tomberlin
Editor/Compositor/Owner
OutPost Pictures