Activity › Forums › Panasonic Cameras › DV100 vs DNxHD vs CFHD
-
Graeme Nattress
April 11, 2005 at 2:41 pm -
Jason J rodriguez
April 11, 2005 at 6:54 pmThanks Graeme.
I’ll actually be at NAB, so maybe we might bump into each other at the LAFCPUG or something.
But if you do find out anything more on this, I’d be very interested in hearing, especially if there is a compositing/color-correction/effects package out there that can deal with DVCProHD natively.
Thanks again,
Jason Rodriguez
Virginia Beach, VA -
Graeme Nattress
April 11, 2005 at 7:19 pmJason, I’ll look forwards to meeting you.
I managed to do a quick experiment this morning though. I told quicktime to give me a frame from some DVCproHD footage, and it gave it to me with 960×720 dimensions not 1280 x 720 dimensions, so there’s certainly hope for editing / effecting DVCproHD without doing the shrink and squeeze routine, and this also means that once magic scaling is up and running, I can probably do better 960 to 1280 scaling anyway.
Graeme
– http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects for FCP
-
Jeremiah Black
April 14, 2005 at 2:39 am(vsv): “This is a Kinetta’s little brother”
Seeing as how the Kinetta isn’t out yet, I’d say that the kinetta is the “vaporware older brother of the Drake”.
Also, I think the Drake also records 10 bit log files to disk. But I could be wrong.
jeremiah black
dual 2 gig G5
2.5 gigs of RAM
Decklink Extreme capture card -
Vsv
April 14, 2005 at 12:26 pmjeremiah black
I’ve agree with you. I mean only price range $60K vs $15K and time of appearances information about this cameras.
These guys (Jeff Kreines and Rai Orz) has forced to think the monsters (Sony, Pana, JVC).
We must have a choice between 10 bit log and level of compression in ONE tapeless camera.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up