Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums DSLR Video DSLRs from list

  • DSLRs from list

    Posted by Adam Leonard on July 27, 2012 at 7:18 am

    Hi Everyone,

    Although I’m mostly a video guy, I recently started working on a cruise ship and they have been making me do much more photography than anything else. And now I have to buy my own DSLR, so naturally I’m thinking that I’ll go with one that would be good for shooting video with when my contract with this company is up. Cost is something of a factor here, but I’m not flat broke or anything. Something that would be less than $1100 including the lens and flash would be preferable. Below is the list of approved cameras. Any suggestions?

    Cannon EOS 1D MK II, III, IV
    Cannon EOS 1DS MK II, III, IV
    Cannon EOS 30D/ 40D/ 50D / 60D
    Cannon EOS 7D
    FujiFilm S3 / S5 Pro
    Leica S2
    Nikon D200
    Nikon D2H / D2X / D2X / D2Hs
    Nikon D3 / D3X / D3S
    Nikon D300 / D300s
    D700/D800/D800E
    Nikon D7000
    Nikon D90
    Olympus E-3 / E-30
    Olympus E-5
    Olympus E-600 / E-620
    Sigma SD1
    Sony A-380
    Sony A-500 / A-550
    Sony A-560 / A-580
    Sony A-700
    Sony A-900 / A-850

    Malcolm Matusky replied 13 years, 8 months ago 7 Members · 15 Replies
  • 15 Replies
  • Bill Bruner

    July 27, 2012 at 12:32 pm

    Adam – although it’s somewhat above your $1100 budget, the $3000 Nikon D800 is the best hybrid still/video camera on your list. With its amazing 36MP sensor, it is a class-leading full-frame still camera – and with its clean HDMI out, manual audio level control and headphone jack, it is a world class video camera. Add a soon-to-be-available VAF-D800 anti-moire filter from Mosaic Engineering, and you’ll have a moire-free, near-broadcast quality video camera after your cruise job is done.

    See Philip Bloom’s full frame shootout between the D800, Canon 5D MkIII (which is not on your list) and the Nikon D4 to see what the D800 can do in video mode with the anti-moire filter: https://vimeo.com/42065372

    Hope this is helpful,

    Bill
    Hybrid Camera Revolution

  • Steve Crow

    July 27, 2012 at 1:33 pm

    I think the Canon 7D would be a terrific option, the same video capabilities as the Canon 5D MII at a much lower price and a very very capable camera for stills too. It’s what I would buy.

    Steve Crow
    Crow Digital Media
    http://www.CrowDigitalMedia.com

  • Casey Petersen

    July 27, 2012 at 2:46 pm

    I used a 7D before purchasing the 60D, and with the articulating screen, as well as being able to use Magic Lantern, I LOVE the 60D, and avoid using the 7D whenever possible.

  • Bill Bruner

    July 28, 2012 at 1:27 pm

    Adam – I don’t know what kind of videos you shoot (event? narrative?), but if you’re considering the $1530 7D or the $890 60D for video, you should be aware that the Canons have a 12 minute video clip duration limit and no headphone jacks. The $3500 5D MkIII takes the clip length limit up to 30 minutes, has a headphone jack and gets rid of the Canon moire problem, but, sadly, it wasn’t on your list.

    And none of the Canons have clean, uncompressed, recordable HDMI out. The Nikon does.

    With the anti-aliasing filter, the D800 is probably the best large sensor, interchangeable lens video-still hybrid camera you can buy between $1000 and the $8000 Sony NEX-FS700 (which, at 8MP, is not much of a still camera :)).

    Cheers,

    Bill
    Hybrid Camera Revolution

  • Adam Leonard

    July 28, 2012 at 7:41 pm

    Ah, I should have mentioned that earlier. I’d really like to use it for narrative, but I’m more likely to be using it for events more often. I’d really like one with a longer record time, but I need this camera fairly soon for this photography job. I also have a real video camera for events, as long as the client doesn’t require a DSLR.

  • Adam Leonard

    July 28, 2012 at 7:43 pm

    So after consulting with a friend and reading these posts, I’m leaning toward either the 7d or the 60d. Any more thoughts on one over the other?

  • Rob Manning

    July 28, 2012 at 8:17 pm

    Any work you will be doing in post? IE. Green screen or other manipulated animations (After Effects in Adobe, or other?) then the codec capture, becomes a consideration.

    ProRes or AVID DNxHD on a Ninja, or the BMD Hyperdeck 2 is fairly economical if just shooting a static series but, if using AE etc. the step up to AVID has better use (according to my DP friends) over ProRes. The read out in Adobe for the DNxHD (maxed) files from the HD2 is 10 bit, 4.2.2 from the D800.

    The Nikon D800 which as noted above, is the only HD enabled DSLR with a direct out other than the Nikon D4. Canon offers this but starting at the $15,000 price point.

    Consider the output needs, and ignore the fan folk and peer pissing contests.

    Will you have expectations for commercial level work in post? If so the Nikon would be a decent choice bang for buck. (TV Spots, short clips, shooting script, set lighting, heavy animations for post etc.)

    Otherwise, for average h.264 (average means vast majority of for hire work out there) sure the Canon took Nikon’s D90 ball from the end zone and ran it back to the fifty yard line, but the game isn’t over and might be escalating when Nikon moves the service center to Hollywood near term.

    Joe Marine, at No Film School did a great job when the marketing hype dust settled comparing end results from the MK2/3 and D800:https://vimeo.com/42381520

    HTH’s

    Rob

    Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!

    This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Vimeo framework” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.

  • Mike Drew

    July 30, 2012 at 1:10 pm

    I think it’s pretty clear that if your budget is around $1100 things like clean hdmi output and the endless debate on which codecs are best aren’t very high on your priority list. These arguments are blown way out of proportion anyway.
    Sorry, I don’t mean to impugn your abilities or future desires but it just sounds to me like your needs are fairly basic.
    I shoot news and short docs pretty much exclusively with the 7D and the 60D, both stills and video, and I love them both. The 60D with it’s swing-out screen and free Magic Lantern firmware is spectacular and my go-to camera for about 80 percent of my work. The 7D will also have new firmware from Canon in August that will vastly increase its video capabilities as well.
    The 12-minute limit is a pain for some things but it’s pretty easy to stop the camera at a natural pause in whatever you’re shooting and then just hit record again. Takes about three seconds. Definitely not a deal-breaker.
    Should you find you need anything more in the future, well, cameras just keep getting better and better. Get your basic needs covered now and worry about higher bitrates and codecs and all that other armchair video-geek stuff later. Get a 60D or a 7D and get shooting.

  • Casey Petersen

    July 30, 2012 at 3:35 pm

    For me, not being able to use Magic Lantern on the 7D is a deal breaker.

    On my 60D, Magic Lantern gives me the ability to have the camera automatically restart recording after the 12 minute limit has been reached. It also gives me the ability to monitor the audio while recording, as well as showing peaking levels (for super-easy focusing), zebra levels, and the ability to zoom on the screen while recording…and dozens of other extremely helpful and creative features.

    Casey

  • Mike Drew

    July 30, 2012 at 3:38 pm

    I completely agree. The new firmware for the 7D will add a lot of features but there’s no doubt that the 60D with ML is the way to go for video.

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy