Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy Does DPI (Print resolutions) matter in video?

  • Does DPI (Print resolutions) matter in video?

    Posted by Creeker on August 9, 2007 at 1:59 pm

    A fellow editor and I are having a disagreement – he feels that still photo images should be converted into 72DPI whereas, I feel it doesn’t matter either way – who is right?
    Cheers!

    Dan Riley replied 18 years, 9 months ago 5 Members · 7 Replies
  • 7 Replies
  • Rafael Amador

    August 9, 2007 at 2:15 pm

    Is not necesary that convertion. All the video and graphic application ( Thanks God) take in to account the total number of pixels. Video is shown in computers at 72 pixel per inch wen is shown at 100%. DPIs are important for printing.
    Rafael

  • Walter Biscardi

    August 9, 2007 at 2:34 pm

    [Creeker] “A fellow editor and I are having a disagreement – he feels that still photo images should be converted into 72DPI whereas, I feel it doesn’t matter either way – who is right?”

    Frame size matters more than DPI. Anything over 72dpi is overkill quite honestly, but what really matters is frame size, especially when you want to do moves on the graphics.

    Walter Biscardi, Jr.
    https://www.biscardicreative.com
    HD Editorial & Animation for Broadcast and independent productions.

    All Things Apple Podcast! https://cowcast.creativecow.net/all_things_apple/index.html

    Read my blog! https://blogs.creativecow.net/WalterBiscardi

  • Creeker

    August 9, 2007 at 2:41 pm

    Thanks for clarification!!
    Cheers,
    Jeff

  • Aaron Neitz

    August 9, 2007 at 3:23 pm

    Well, really DPI has absolutely nothing to do at all with video. The only time DPI matters is when you’re discussing a physical recreation of pixels. Printing a 640×480 frame at 72 dpi will yield a 8.8″ x 6.6″ print…. or a 4.2″ x 3.2″ @ 150dpi. so pixels are pixels – it’s just a way to express the density of resolution you want to present them in the physical world —- it is also useful in terms of how big your monitor is and how small the pixels are; how many pixels per inch they can display

  • Dan Riley

    August 9, 2007 at 4:39 pm

    And I might add, just to be clear about it, what you want to have for stills in video apps is frame sizes LARGER than the video frame size if possible. Then you can
    move in on it or around it. SO a still that’s 1500 by 1200 let’s say, will allow you to
    zoom in up to 75% before losing resolution (in SD). Or it allows you to crop the shot
    to just what you want to use and still fill up the frame. For HD video, even
    larger stills are better for the same reason. DPI doesn’t mean a thing
    in video, unless you are worrying about printing a still shot from video.

    Dan

  • Aaron Neitz

    August 9, 2007 at 5:04 pm

    I can’t tell you how many times clients ask me: “can we get a still from the Digibeta for our print campaign?” And then when I warm them it’s only going to be about 2×2″ at 300dpi, they always act betrayed. Therein lie the deceptive powers of the CRT.

  • Dan Riley

    August 9, 2007 at 5:08 pm

    Yeah, going HD is nice for that type of thing.
    The stills the print people want for their marketing pieces (like you mention)
    are pretty good from 1910 by 1080 pixel video.

    dr

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy