Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy Digitizing Betacam tapes with FCP7

  • Digitizing Betacam tapes with FCP7

    Posted by Jeff Cadge on December 1, 2011 at 2:57 am

    Hello,

    We’ve been working almost entirely tapeless with P2HD and FCP7 with a solid workflow.

    A client gave us a bunch of Betacam master tapes to digitize into FCP using our Kona LH and wonder what setting you guys use for the best results.

    We did a couple of tests:

    525 29.97 ProRes HQ resulting in a 720×486 file that is choppy in playback with a size of about 600 MB/min

    525 29.97 8 bit resulting in a 720×486 file which is clean but a larger file size of about 1.2 GB/min

    Any ideas which settings would provide the best results without producing huge files?

    We have a lot of Betacam masters to digitize.

    Thanks for your help.

    Jeff Cadge

    Daryl Larson replied 14 years, 4 months ago 5 Members · 4 Replies
  • 4 Replies
  • Steve Eisen

    December 1, 2011 at 4:40 am

    Standard ProRes is the perfect setting. HQ is overkill!

    Steve Eisen
    Eisen Video Productions
    Vice President
    Chicago Final Cut Pro Users Group

  • Kevin Rag

    December 1, 2011 at 8:19 am

    I agree with Steve. ProRes 422 is the way to go.

    Kannan Raghavan
    The Big Toad Films Pte. Ltd.

  • Chris Tompkins

    December 1, 2011 at 1:09 pm

    Make sure you are playing back the media off drives for video editing…

    Chris Tompkins
    Video Atlanta LLC

  • Daryl Larson

    December 20, 2011 at 9:01 pm

    Hi,

    I have done a bunch of work with Betacam tapes and Kona cards. Never had any problems with playback-we use an XSAN storage system so file size really doesn’t matter to us…

    I have also used a Matrox MX02 system to digitize natively to Apple Pro Res (not HQ) and the resolution has been good. Playback was off of FireWire 800 & 400 HDs and we had no problems. File sizes were big but not as big as APR HQ files (which did not playback well from FW).

    I would try regular APR instead of HQ.

    Caveat: the source footage I have been working with is old and in some cases not the greatest, so all I can say is that the APR footage did not look any worse than the original.

    Gryfwalker

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy