Activity › Forums › Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy › Deinterlace plug
-
Deinterlace plug
Posted by Tom Brooks on August 7, 2007 at 2:42 amI need to deinterlace some 60i DV footage to intersperse with some 30P (Yes, THE 30P.) material in a Ken Burns-ish history program. Any recommendations on a really good, fast (motion-compensated?) deinterlacer that I could just drop in as an effect and take care of the 60i bits (without dropping another 1000 clams). Fieldskit looks like a good package. Nattress Film Effects has deinterlacers and other goodies. Your ideas? Thx.
Ed Dooley replied 18 years, 9 months ago 8 Members · 10 Replies -
10 Replies
-
Rafael Amador
August 7, 2007 at 3:47 amTom,
The two of them are really good. Fieldskit is mor specific about interlacing (it got de-interlacer, pull down remover and re-interlacer) and give you some options that you don’t get with Nattress (like making a ful Frame from each field). The Nattress is great and come with many interesting things in the same package.
You can make a try as well with “Smart de-interlace” of TooMuchTooSoon. Is free. Works very well if you set the “Motion sensitiviti” to the top.
Cheers,
Rafael -
Jeremy Garchow
August 7, 2007 at 3:55 amRafael has some good suggestions, and I have one that is expensive. Boris Continuum Complete has pretty nice deinterlacer, but if you buy it just for that, it might not be worth it. BCC is a pretty good suite of effects. I use it a lot for Green Screen within FCP.
Jeremy
-
Anders Haavie
August 7, 2007 at 7:03 amRevisionFX is great. I use it alot. However it’s quite slow. I find it faster in AE than FCP. Nattress is supposed to be good as well.
Anders
-
Chris Poisson
August 7, 2007 at 1:44 pmFieldsKit is exactly what you want, it’s as good as or better than any other. Plus it works in FCP and AE. Fantastic control.
-
Ed Dooley
August 7, 2007 at 3:23 pmAnd one more: Do a search here for it in this forum. Compression does a great job
(without just throwing away a field). It’s in the Advanced Format Conversion section.
Ed -
Tom Brooks
August 7, 2007 at 5:10 pmEd,
Yep, I have used that function with good results. I’ll have to weigh the advantages of a batch conversion of clips as opposed to a plug-in approach. I guess it comes down to which one saves the most time and quality and if it’s a tossup, the free one wins. Thanks.
-Tom -
Camshaft
August 7, 2007 at 7:37 pmWhat are people’s thoughts on FCP’s de-interlacer? I have used it on DV and it “appears” to work very well. When going for a look is when I’ve used Nattress Film FX, and the included de-interlacing. Both of these options are loads cheaper than Boris.
Cameron Young
-
Graeme Nattress
August 7, 2007 at 8:30 pmIf you have FCP6 you can try the one that I do in Color too, which is smarter than the smart ones I have for FCP in Film Effects.
Graeme
– http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP
-
Ed Dooley
August 7, 2007 at 10:39 pmThe built-in de-interlacer throws away information. I wouldn’t recommend it when there are other (even free) options.
Ed[camshaft] “What are people’s thoughts on FCP’s de-interlacer? I have used it on DV and it “appears” to work very well. When going for a look is when I’ve used Nattress Film FX, and the included de-interlacing. Both of these options are loads cheaper than Boris.”
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up