Activity › Forums › DaVinci Resolve › Decreased performance with 8.2 install
-
Decreased performance with 8.2 install
Posted by Chris Tomberlin on March 11, 2012 at 2:53 amIs anyone out there experiencing a DECREASE in real time playback performance after the 8.2 update? A clip with several nodes that was playing back at 24fps before the upgrade is now playing around 17-18. I haven’t changed any GPU or CUDA settings after the install. This is all on Mac under snow leopard.
Thanks
Chris Tomberlin
Editor/Compositor/Owner
OutPost PicturesRene Hazekamp replied 14 years, 1 month ago 6 Members · 14 Replies -
14 Replies
-
Ola Haldor voll
March 11, 2012 at 1:22 pmI’m on Lion 10.7.2
No difference in performance here.Have you filled up your hard drive? Is RAM filled up? If you haven’t, try a complete shutdown and restart the computer.
I find that shutting off the computer completely solves most problems rather than a reboot. But that only happens once or twice a month.
-
Rene Hazekamp
March 11, 2012 at 4:52 pmyep
More or less the same problem, here in Holland.
Harddrive A has OSX 10.6.8 and Resolve 8.1 and plays back 18 nodes at 25 fpm (1080p)
Harddrive B has OSX 10.7.3 and Resolve 8.2 and plays back 6 nodes at max 22 fpm.Both systems have this AGPM. kext thingy removed, the only difference is that i accidentally (?) updated my cuda driver at harddrive B (os 10.7.3). Harddrive A has still cuda driver 4.0.50.
I tried to change systems and versions because in OSX 10.6.8 Resolve always crashed when i wanted to render to anykind of DNX code.
Resolve Lite, MACPRO 4.1, 12 GB, 8*2.26 Ghz, NVIdia gt 120/470
answers and explanations are more than welcome
René A. Hazekamp
(I would have bought the dongle if someone could guarantee that it would resolve all problems)
-
Chris Tomberlin
March 11, 2012 at 5:11 pmRene
Your dual boot setup does leave the question though as to whether the 8.2 update itself is causing the issue in Snow Leopard. It would be interesting to see what happens if you updated the 8.1 snow leopard install to 8.2. I don’t want you to wreck your system though. Two other things we do have in common is the removal of the power management next and the graphics card – I’m using a flashed 470 as well. I have another partition set up with Lion I may try it there and see what happens.
Thanks for the feedback….
Chris Tomberlin
Editor/Compositor/Owner
OutPost Pictures -
Rene Hazekamp
March 11, 2012 at 7:15 pmHey Chris
Seems we have a similar problem. Cause I can’t mess with my old system ( to much going on there ), I uninstalled resolve 8.2 on systemdrive B (osx 10.7.3) and installed resolve 8.1.? . This gave me the same slow performance 6 nodes realtime instead of 18 ( i also had some memory/database problems with the memory banks (command 1/2/3etc) , but i didn’t look into that – probably an uninstall/install issue).
I have last fridays cuda driver on systemdrive B. And i would like to try to go back to an older driver version (4.0.50 preferably) , but i don’t know how (yet)
all the best
René A. Hazekamp
-
Rene Hazekamp
March 11, 2012 at 7:53 pmHey Chris
Try to zap your pram (cmd.alt.P.R). To my surprise the realtime performance went up from 6 nodes to 11/12. This with system 10.7.3 and resolve 8.1 . I didn’t reinstall resolve 8.2 yet, (i’am not an install hobbyist)
It’s not as good as the 18 nodes i get with system 10.6.8 and resolve 8.1, but this could cover 90 percent of what i need. So it’s a step.Why it works i don’t know, but i thought if Lion memorises all this windows positions it might as well do the same with power management. -but it’s a big ???, maybe it’s just luck-
Resolve Lite, MACPRO 4.1, 12 GB, 8*2.26 Ghz, NVIdia gt 120/470
René A. Hazekamp
-
Gabriele Turchi
March 11, 2012 at 10:32 pmrene
are you saying that on 10.6.8 on the same machine you get 5-6 nodes more than on 10.7.3 ????
g
Davinci Resolve Control Surface
MacPro
Cubix desktop 4
2 Red Rockets
GTX470+GTX470+GTX285
24GB RAM
HP Dreamcolor
Panasonic 58PF Plasma -
Rene Hazekamp
March 11, 2012 at 11:21 pmThat is what I saw, yes. It was not a very scientific test, but anyway. I had like 5-6 more nodes playing back in realtime with 10.6.8 + resolve 8.1 than with 10.7.3 and Resolve 8.1. The only difference was that in the snow leopard version i had cuda 4.0.50 (from memory) and in the lion set up i had the latest cuda driver (well, last fridays).
I’am talking Resolve Lite, xdcam ex 1080p /25 fps macpro 4.1/2.26 gig /8 core/ nvidia gtx 120/470)
the strange thing was that i doubled the realtime playback nodes after zapping the pram -in the Lion setup-
though it came from only 6 nodes rt playback.I have repeated the results a few times (4-8), but to draw solid conclusions i should do some more tests in some other configurations , – keying, bluring,sharpening whatever-
-
Gabriele Turchi
March 11, 2012 at 11:27 pmwell…,
i thought you had a dual boot (lion and snow leopard and you were running the same project on both to obtain the results..)that would be a precise test …otherwise if is based on memory not sharing the same exact footage and project nodes…who knows …
ps: about the PRAM : i read that help the render speed as well … i am wondering WHY the Pram gets filled up using resolve …maybe it’s something that the BMD team should have a look at it (or maybe is a OSX and Cuda usage issue ..)
g
Davinci Resolve Control Surface
MacPro
Cubix desktop 4
2 Red Rockets
GTX470+GTX470+GTX285
24GB RAM
HP Dreamcolor
Panasonic 58PF Plasma
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up