Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Adobe Premiere Pro CUDA card or Kona 3 – Pick 1 for use

  • CUDA card or Kona 3 – Pick 1 for use

    Posted by Tom Daigon on July 7, 2011 at 1:54 pm

    Wow, I just learned from Adobe tech support,something that has the potential to really disappoint a lot of editors switching to PrP 5.5. I was told that PrP supports only 1 graphics card at a time. So you have a choice. If you want to take full advantage of your CUDA card speeding certain things up, then you cant use the Kona 3 card to output the video to an engineering / client monitor. And conversely, if you need to see your video from the Kona 3 card displayed on a external monitor, you cant take advantage of the MPE / CUDA benefits from your Nvidia card. Yikes.

    Tom Daigon
    Avid DS / FCP / After Effects Editor
    http://www.hdshotsandcuts.com

    Tom Daigon replied 15 years ago 5 Members · 17 Replies
  • 17 Replies
  • David Cherniack

    July 7, 2011 at 2:10 pm

    Tom, that sounds like completely false info unless it’s specific to the KOna 3 drivers for PrPro. The third party io cards work independently of CUDA.

    David
    AllinOneFilms.com

  • Tim Kolb

    July 7, 2011 at 2:12 pm

    Actually…you’ve got it partly right.

    First, the Kona 3 isn’t a graphics card…it’s video I/O. I run two Quadros (four displays) and a Kona LHi with CS5.5.

    The CUDA effects support runs on the NVIDIA card…which feeds a display via DVI, DisplayPort…whatever.

    The Kona cards interact with the computer through the PCIe buss…which plugs into the CPU.

    I don’t think it’s that CUDA stops working…it’s that CUDA is fastest when the process doesn’t have to take the assembled frame and suck it back from the display card to the CPU and the n spit it out to the I/O card.

    TimK,
    Director, Consultant
    Kolb Productions,

    Adobe Certified Instructor

  • Tom Daigon

    July 7, 2011 at 2:17 pm

    No the case with Kona according to Adobe tech support. In the prefs menu is the “Player” option. You choose either Adobe or AJA. When using Kona 3 you must use one of their preset sequence choices or it will not display thru their system. If you build a regular sequence to use the CUDA card, it will NOT display thru the Kona. This is all new to me so Im just reporting things as I bump into them.

    Tom Daigon
    Avid DS / FCP / After Effects Editor
    http://www.hdshotsandcuts.com

  • Tom Daigon

    July 7, 2011 at 2:19 pm

    That would be great news to my ears. But the question is, does the CUDA still do its MPE functions when I am using a AJA preset sequence, since that is required for displaying the Kona video on an external monitor?

    Tom Daigon
    Avid DS / FCP / After Effects Editor
    http://www.hdshotsandcuts.com

  • David Cherniack

    July 7, 2011 at 2:55 pm

    Tim should probably answer this as he’s familiar with AJA. But with Matrox, the CUDA effects are more certainly fully operational in Matrox sequences. I wouldn’t expect AJA drivers to work any differently.

    David
    AllinOneFilms.com

  • Tom Daigon

    July 7, 2011 at 2:56 pm

    I certainly hope that is the case with AJA. If not I have confidence in their ability to institute it. 😉

    Tom Daigon
    Avid DS / FCP / After Effects Editor
    http://www.hdshotsandcuts.com

  • Tom Daigon

    July 7, 2011 at 3:13 pm

    Karl Lee Soule had this to say…

    Tom, I believe this recently changed with the release of the new Kona drivers last week. It was true that the GPU benefits did not use to work when in an AJA preset timeline, because the AJA drivers didn’t take advantage of it. But AJA rewrote the drivers.

    Tom Daigon
    Avid DS / FCP / After Effects Editor
    http://www.hdshotsandcuts.com

  • Chris Knight

    July 7, 2011 at 3:46 pm

    My Kona 3, running in 5.0 (I won’t upgrade until I’ve seen it work properly in 5.5) isn’t affected much by CUDA (if at all) in the timeline, but I mainly use it for outputting already-edited broadcast spots, and I generally have 7 or 8 graphics tracks (phone numbers, etc.) going (requiring rendering anyway, so CUDA is pointless in that respect). However, it does make a difference when outputting the timeline to an h.264 file.

    Overall, I prefer to edit outside of the AJA-verse, because it just feels more sluggish (it was much smoother in CS3, and barely ever worked in CS4). If 5.5 fixes this, I’ll revisit that opinion.

  • David Cherniack

    July 7, 2011 at 4:06 pm

    I’ve always perceived AJA as a FCP-centric company with support for PrPro almost an afterthought, especially on the Mac. I’m sure this will change somewhat with the wave of new users coming over from FCP but if I owned a Kona card I’d be trying to kick up their involvement by addressing my concerns to their management.

    David
    AllinOneFilms.com

  • Tom Daigon

    July 7, 2011 at 4:23 pm

    Yes I am 🙂

    Tom Daigon
    Avid DS / FCP / After Effects Editor
    http://www.hdshotsandcuts.com

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy