-
Critique my mastering out of a DVC Pro HD project for PAL…
Hiya Cows
I’m about to finish a short doc for PAL Digibeta delivery. Have been cutting in DVC Pro HD 720/25 (shot P2 @ 25 to get more capacity from smallish cards).
Am also using some DV25 material in the show (archive) some of which is PAL, some of which has been transcoded from NTSC into DV25. I have allowed this material to be re-sized in the timeline rather than transcoding it into new DVC Pro HD clips. (Did a test, doesn’t seem to make much difference). Also some stills, dropped straight into the time line.
I use a Matrox MXO for monitoring, and while I could hire a digi deck and output myself from the MXO, I am going to output at a larger post house which has a hardware broadcast legalizer, which they can stick in between their Mac Pro w Blackmagic Decklink Extreme and the deck (via SDI).
So here’s what I plan:
(i) grade via Matrox MXO on ACD 23″, using the Matrox DVC Pro HD YUV setting, also monitoring on a small regular tube TV via composite out.
(ii) ARC my DV25 footage to 16:9 as necessary
(iii) transcode the whole thing to a self-contained PAL Quicktime (8 bit – do I need the extra 2?) This should translate colour spaces and the grade effectively, right? Tests seem to indicate yes, but any gotchas I should look out for?
(iv) create the end credits in the PAL version to avoid stuttering / interlacing issues
(v) Look for strobing / interlacing issues on this new PAL version (eg I have a map from the 1960s whose dot screen printing does not strobe at DVC Pro HD res, but which does strobe in PAL – whether downconverted via software or hardware, I’ve checked. Flicker filter takes care of it).
(vi) Run the FCP broadcast safe filter on it on a moderate setting, and have a run through with the warning bars on (it’s going through the legalizer but why not, if there is any issue it gives me more control in how I deal with it, right?)
What do we think? I know I could do the down-conversion in hardware at the larger post house with their Blackmagic setup, but I figure the slightly longer route with the software down-conversion will give me more control – given that I am going from progressive source to interlaced delivery format for example…