Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy Converting 16:9 to 4×3

  • Tony Brittan

    October 1, 2012 at 11:49 pm

    Drop the finished 16:9 master into a 4:3 timeline and increase the scale until it fills the frame. Render and export. I would use a Prores 4:3 timeline.

  • Shane Ross

    October 2, 2012 at 12:17 am

    Note: There is no such thing as 4:3 HD…so the timeline will pretty much have to be SD.

    Shane
    Little Frog Post
    Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def

  • Ron Fenley,

    October 2, 2012 at 12:20 am

    Don’t see an Apple Pro Res 4:3 option.

  • Tony Brittan

    October 2, 2012 at 12:22 am

    Sorry…I guess I assumed they knew that Shane 🙂 But yea…that’s why I suggested Prores…at least it’ll be better than NTSC.

  • Ron Fenley,

    October 2, 2012 at 12:29 am

    Haven’t shot it yet. Was considering just shooting the 42 spots all in SD and call it a day but I’m shooting with white background and using luminance key to swap out the white bg with white slug. Works good in HD. Not so good in SD.

    Really appreciate the advice. Think I want to let their web guys worry about the 4×3 conversion. Knuckleheads. I’m supposed to start shooting tomorrow and they just told me about the 4×3 stuff. Thanks again my friend. I owe you one.

    — ron

  • Phil Smith

    October 2, 2012 at 1:07 am

    I believe what you are looking for is “Apple ProRes 422 NTSC 48 kHz”. Once you pick that setting, you should see the frame size of your sequence change to 720 x 486. Good luck!


    Phil Smith
    There are no technical solutions to creative problems. Only creative solutions to technical problems.

  • Jeff Meyer

    October 2, 2012 at 3:37 am

    If it’s going to web wouldn’t 640×480 (or better yet – the final video size) using a square pixel aspect ratio be the correct choice?

  • Joseph Owens

    October 2, 2012 at 3:15 pm

    [Jeff Meyer] “If it’s going to web wouldn’t 640×480 (or better yet – the final video size) using a square pixel aspect ratio be the correct choice?

    Yes, you’re in for a world of hurt now.

    You want to be hexadecimal compatible (everything divisible by 16) if you want a clean web presence. So you will likely wind up in a 480P format, whatever the pixel aspect ratio might be that you negotiate and finally cram into the “standard” NTSC frame.

    jPo

    “I always pass on free advice — its never of any use to me” Oscar Wilde.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy