Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums VEGAS Pro conversion from VHS to DVD, why is some of the image quality so much worse than in the intermediate DV file?

  • conversion from VHS to DVD, why is some of the image quality so much worse than in the intermediate DV file?

    Posted by David Paine on January 11, 2015 at 11:08 pm

    I haven’t noticed anyone mentioning the precise problem I am experiencing, but I would like to understand what I am observing.

    Here is my setup:
    20-year old VHS tape played on S-VHS player
    S-VHS player attached via S-video cable to Canopus ADVC 100
    ADVC 100 attached via 1394 cable to Windows 8.1 PC
    DV captured through Vegas Pro v12

    Capturing for about 10 minutes yielded an avi file with the properties listed in block 1 below, but summarizing–> file size 2.87 GB, format DV, 720 x 480, interlaced (bottom field first), NTSC, 29.97 fps, 24 mbps video bit rate.

    Playing back the captured DV file on my computer, I was pleasantly surprised at the video quality I was observing.

    In trying to produce a DVD from this DV file using Vegas Pro and DVD Architect with appropriate NTSC profiles, I was very dissatisfied with the video quality that was output from a DVD player. Specifically, landscapes and peoples’ faces were smudged (that blurry, plastic, watercolor look). Other than those types of scenes the image quality was fine.

    The media information for the DVD VOB is in block 2 below.
    Summarizing it –> file size 771 MB, format MPEG-PS V2, 7270 x 480, interlaced (bottom field first), NTSC, 29.97 fps, 8 mbps video bit rate.

    Clearly, the video file on the DVD is far smaller than the DV file captured from the VHS tape, so it is reasonable that the DVD quality would be reduced…
    A. but a typical DVD can deliver a pretty high quality image at 8 mbps, and
    B. my computer can generate a pretty good picture from the captured DV file prior to rendering for DVD

    So, my questions are:
    why the disparity for certain image types?
    How can I improve the image quality when building the files for a DVD?

    Thanks for your insights,

    – David P

    ************ block 1 *******************************************************
    General
    Complete name : H:\TTS video\TTS2 – Clip 001.avi
    Format : AVI
    Format/Info : Audio Video Interleave
    Commercial name : DV
    Format profile : OpenDML
    File size : 2.87 GiB
    Duration : 13mn 30s
    Overall bit rate mode : Constant
    Overall bit rate : 30.4 Mbps
    TAPE : TTS2
    TCOD : 3537534000
    TCDO : 11641630000
    VMAJ : 4
    VMIN : 0
    STAT : 24288 0 3.120727 1
    DTIM : 0 0

    Video
    ID : 0
    Format : DV
    Codec ID : dvsd
    Codec ID/Hint : Sony
    Duration : 13mn 30s
    Bit rate mode : Constant
    Bit rate : 24.4 Mbps
    Encoded bit rate : 28.8 Mbps
    Width : 720 pixels
    Height : 480 pixels
    Display aspect ratio : 4:3
    Frame rate mode : Constant
    Frame rate : 29.970 fps
    Standard : NTSC
    Color space : YUV
    Chroma subsampling : 4:1:1
    Bit depth : 8 bits
    Scan type : Interlaced
    Scan order : Bottom Field First
    Compression mode : Lossy
    Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 2.357
    Time code of first frame : 00:05:53;22
    Time code source : Subcode time code
    Stream size : 2.71 GiB (95%)

    Audio
    ID : 1
    Format : PCM
    Format settings, Endianness : Little
    Format settings, Sign : Signed
    Codec ID : 1
    Duration : 13mn 30s
    Bit rate mode : Constant
    Bit rate : 1 536 Kbps
    Channel(s) : 2 channels
    Sampling rate : 48.0 KHz
    Bit depth : 16 bits
    Stream size : 148 MiB (5%)
    Alignment : Aligned on interleaves
    Interleave, duration : 267 ms (8.00 video frames)
    Interleave, preload duration : 266 ms

    ************ block 2 *******************************************************
    General
    Complete name : D:\transitory\DVD Architect image\TTS\VIDEO_TS\VTS_01_1.VOB
    Format : MPEG-PS
    File size : 771 MiB
    Duration : 10mn 59s
    Overall bit rate mode : Variable
    Overall bit rate : 9 797 Kbps

    Video
    ID : 224 (0xE0)
    Format : MPEG Video
    Format version : Version 2
    Format profile : Main@Main
    Format settings, BVOP : Yes
    Format settings, Matrix : Default
    Format settings, GOP : M=3, N=15
    Duration : 10mn 59s
    Bit rate mode : Variable
    Bit rate : 8 066 Kbps
    Maximum bit rate : 9 500 Kbps
    Width : 720 pixels
    Height : 480 pixels
    Display aspect ratio : 4:3
    Frame rate : 29.970 fps
    Standard : NTSC
    Color space : YUV
    Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
    Bit depth : 8 bits
    Scan type : Interlaced
    Scan order : Bottom Field First
    Compression mode : Lossy
    Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.779
    Time code of first frame : 00:00:00:00
    Time code source : Group of pictures header
    Stream size : 635 MiB (82%)

    Audio
    ID : 189 (0xBD)-160 (0xA0)
    Format : PCM
    Format settings, Endianness : Big
    Format settings, Sign : Signed
    Muxing mode : DVD-Video
    Duration : 10mn 59s
    Bit rate mode : Constant
    Bit rate : 1 536 Kbps
    Channel(s) : 2 channels
    Sampling rate : 48.0 KHz
    Bit depth : 16 bits
    Delay relative to video : -67ms
    Stream size : 121 MiB (16%)

    John Rofrano replied 11 years, 4 months ago 4 Members · 9 Replies
  • 9 Replies
  • Sonic 67

    January 12, 2015 at 6:02 pm

    Try to use the two-pass encoding.

  • John Rofrano

    January 12, 2015 at 10:15 pm

    [Sorin Nicu] “Try to use the two-pass encoding.”

    Definitely try Two-Pass under Customize Template. You also have to realize that DV uses 4:1:1 color sampling and DVD MPEG2 uses 4:2:0 which means your final video uses 4:1:0 color sampling. That’s pretty poor so don’t expect much.

    ~jr

    http://www.johnrofrano.com
    http://www.vasst.com

  • Sonic 67

    January 12, 2015 at 10:47 pm

    [John Rofrano] “DV uses 4:1:1 color sampling and DVD MPEG2 uses 4:2:0”
    That’s what’s sad.
    I thought that because DV uses 4:1:1 subsampling in NTSC/60 Hz variant and 4:2:0 subsampling in PAL/50 Hz variant, DVD MPEG2 will do the same.
    But no, they know better 🙂

  • Nigel O’neill

    January 12, 2015 at 11:55 pm

    [John Rofrano] “That’s pretty poor so don’t expect much.”

    John, does that mean that using the default DVD template of Vegas and 2 pass encoding is the optimal way to preserve quality when trying to preserve VHS recordings? In my case, I used DV pass through from an old DV camera into firewire to capture. I did notice that there was a softening of the overall image, but put that down to conversion/compression. Are there any tricks of the trade to preserve quality when working with VHS?

    My system specs: Intel i7 970, 12GB RAM, ASUS P6T, Vegas Pro 12 (x64), Windows 7 x64 Ultimate, Vegas Production Assistant 1.0, VASST Ultimate S Pro 4.1, Neat Video Pro 2.6

  • Sonic 67

    January 13, 2015 at 12:05 am

    Maybe a dedicated MPEG2 converter will work better in preserving the VHS quality? Similar with:

    https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16815116029

  • John Rofrano

    January 13, 2015 at 12:49 pm

    You’re correct. I should have said NTSC DV uses 4:1:1 because PAL DV does use 4:2:0 which maintains better color when printing to DVD. I was commenting based on the specs that were posted which clearly said, “Chroma subsampling : 4:1:1” and therefore I assumed NTSC.

    ~jr

    http://www.johnrofrano.com
    http://www.vasst.com

  • John Rofrano

    January 13, 2015 at 12:52 pm

    [Sorin Nicu] “Maybe a dedicated MPEG2 converter will work better in preserving the VHS quality?”

    Yea, that’s what I was going to say. I purchased an MPEG2 capture device a long time ago specifically for capturing VHS tapes that I just wanted to send directly to DVD. I concluded that it was better to just buy a VHS to DVD player/recorder that cut the computer out completely (much quicker).

    ~jr

    http://www.johnrofrano.com
    http://www.vasst.com

  • David Paine

    January 15, 2015 at 6:01 am

    A ten minute capture lets you try lots of experiments without big effort and time penalties. The suggestions in this thread have led to some improvements in VHS-to-DVD conversion quality, but after lots of A-B comparisons, and after learning a bit about video format conversion (and color sampling), I am realizing that there are fundamental barriers imposed by the source material and the technology available to me.

    All things considered, I am satisfied with the modest quality improvements that I have obtained.

    Thanks to the responders to my original question.

  • John Rofrano

    January 15, 2015 at 1:37 pm

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy