Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums DaVinci Resolve Conforming problem with h264

  • Conforming problem with h264

    Posted by Jonathan Bigler on March 12, 2012 at 12:00 pm

    I am working with projects that have mixed RED raw files and Canon 5D h264 files. When I export an XML or an EDL from Final Cut Pro 7, the Red files conform properly. But The h264 files are not conforming.

    I get conflicts in the timeline which I have to resolve one by one.

    Any tip on how to get Davinci to conform those h264 files properly?

    (For info, we use proxy ProRes of both the RED and 5D footage for the editing)

    Jonathan

    Dmitry Kitsov replied 14 years, 1 month ago 4 Members · 9 Replies
  • 9 Replies
  • Robert Houllahan

    March 12, 2012 at 2:09 pm

    Does the h264 footage have timecode? i.e. when you converted the 5D footage did you set individual timecode to each reel? This is a common prolem with 5D footage because the camera does not generate timecode.

    -Rob-

    Robert Houllahan
    Director / Colorist
    Cinelab Inc.
    http://www.cinelab.com

    MAHC-PRO 6-Core 3X GTX285 20Tb SAS Wave Panel Panny 11UK SDI Plasma.

  • Dmitry Kitsov

    March 12, 2012 at 7:34 pm

    I had a similar problem with a client providing AIC .mov each one of them starting with 00:00:00:00 timecode. There is a little piece of software called qtChange. It cost $25 dollars and does wonders on Quicktime files by creating a new timecode. It can also extract time of make from a THM sidecar file if you have an access to the original media structure from dslr (good practice to copy an entire card rather than files anyway). The danger of course is that if there is any useful timecode in the files to be modified it will alter it and break any workflow that relies on the existing timecode. If there was no useful timecode to begin with there is almost 0 risk in altering the edit. The reason is that many editing apps (FCP and Premiere) do not explicitly use timecode to conform the timeline. They are counting frames from the beginning of the file. There are some exceptions however (some FCP nested sequences or multicam may suffer.) Anyhow I recommend making a copy of a project and trying it with qtChange (google it). I can confirm that using it on a footage that all had the same timecode and no reel names did work in FCP and in PPro (PC). I just had to set up reel name creation in qtChange, and offline and relink all of the files after altering the timecode. I also had to change some settings in Resolve (do not recall right now) and use amf instead of xml to conform.
    P.S. My resolve station is a Windows station. so xml might work fine for you (my understanding – fcp xml 5 out of PPro on Windows is buggy)

  • Esteban Aguilera

    March 12, 2012 at 8:22 pm

    I recommend to use a track for RED and another track for 5D clips.

    If you are using xml, unclick the option in settings “assist using reel numbers from the” and it works for me. it reads the entire timeline.

    Di Davinci Resolve Colorist

  • Jonathan Bigler

    March 13, 2012 at 11:57 am

    qtChange seems like a good way to do this. Thanks for the tip. Do you know, if I add a time code to the h264 file, and then convert it to ProRes. Is the timecode going to follow? Since you work with Windows, you probably haven’t tried that. I’ll give this a shot, and post my results.

  • Jonathan Bigler

    March 13, 2012 at 11:58 am

    No it doesn’t. And the issue is that not only I want my proxies to have timecode, but also the original h264 files. Since I rather grade from the h264 than the converted ProRes. I guess qtChange will do the job.

  • Jonathan Bigler

    March 13, 2012 at 12:01 pm

    That sounds good, where do you find that option? While exporting in FCP, or while importing in DaVinci? I don’t seem to find it.

    Final cut uses file names and frame count. I would be surprised if DaVinci wasn’t able to do the same. I guess you’ve got the trick.

  • Dmitry Kitsov

    March 13, 2012 at 5:28 pm

    Actually codec shouldn’t make a difference. timecode here is a something that the wrapper takes care of. In this case is .mov. It also makes no difference if you convert to ProRes first. But as I said do run a test on a duplicate project and duplicates of the files to make sure it won’t break your edit.

  • Esteban Aguilera

    March 13, 2012 at 6:45 pm

    Look at this video I did, it is how I do.

    https://youtu.be/pAzGFc-uNzM

    Di Davinci Resolve Colorist

  • Dmitry Kitsov

    March 14, 2012 at 5:44 am

    If DaVinci would use frame count rather than the timecode then the grade would break (dynamics/windows/timing) every time you change your edit or bring in the clips in from somewhere else (VFX etc). Just an educated guess.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy