-
Cleaner XL (PC) vs. Cleaner 6 (Mac)
I just got the latest version of Cleaner XL for PC. I’ve been using Cleaner 6.0.1 on my Mac at work for years. I encoded a clip on the pc with the same settings I always use when encoding on the mac, and noticed the clip looked much worse than the mac encoded version. The image resolution/quality wasn’t as good, and it was a larger file size. The mac is much better at deinterlacing (very smooth lines) where I get jaggies w/pc. What’s also strange is that the pc (amd64 2.0ghz) seems like it’s encoding too fast (almost realtime), compared to the mac (core duo 2ghz) which takes about 2-3 times longer.
Anyone else notice the difference between these two cleaner versions?
Some of the settings are labeled differently between platforms, but are otherwise the same. Here’s what I use for a :30 clip:
codec: Sorenson 3
bit depth: millions
spatial: 50
frame rate: 30
keyframe: 300
video data rate: (basic) 1400 kbits
image size: 400×300
deinterlace: eliminate top field (adaptive)
sharpen: 1.5
adaptive noise reduce: mildAudio: mpeg-4, 32kHz, 112 kbits best
Mac encoded clip= 5.5mb
PC encoded clip= 10.1mbI also have squeeze on my PC but found it’s Quicktime encoding to be much worse than any version of cleaner. Same for Compressor. Like Cleaner XL, both Squeeze and Compressor encode too fast, as though they could do a better job w/quality and smaller file-size if they just spent longer encoding.