Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Forums Compression Techniques Cleaner or Compressor

  • Cleaner or Compressor

  • Jason Pachomski

    August 18, 2009 at 5:19 pm

    Hey everyone … been a long time. Hope y’all are well.

    This might be an age old question, but lemme lay out my goals and see if it warrants an answer — it’d be much appreciated.

    K, so first, here’s my setup:

    Mac 2×3.2 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon
    Leopard (10.5.5)
    Avid 3.5.2
    Cleaner 6.5
    Compressor 3.0.5

    Input Codec: Avid Meridian Compressed

    Destination Codec: H.264 for download

    My goal is to set up a Watch Folder (on a secondary machine dedicated to encoding) that I can export Same As Source QTs out of the Avid into and then have Cleaner/Compressor immediately grab it, compress it using the default compression setting and then put it in a default destination folder.

    Things to consider:

    there’s the potential for LARGE batches being placed in the Watch Folder at once.

    which ever program I use, it has to poll the watch folder frequently enough so that the lag time from when a source QT is put in the folder and the time the program beings compressing it is MINIMAL (e.g. immediately would be ideal).

    What does everyone think? Anyone have a similar setup?

    Thanks in advance for any suggestions!!

    PS. JUST HAD AN AFTERTHOUGHT … would exporting Reference QTs instead of Same-As-Source (for the Source files) work? Would it be faster? I’d imagine so, but I’m nervous about those little buggers. I’ve had issues with them in the past (not seeing media etc etc).

    Los Angeles

  • Daniel Low

    August 18, 2009 at 9:09 pm

    Ref QT would certainly be much quicker as part of a workflow but ‘may’ cause issues but it’s rare. If it were me I’d go with ref movies and then trouble shoot as and when.

    If you are asking whether you should be using cleaner or compressor, well there is no choice, it has to be compressor. If you had instead asked compressor or episode, I would have said episode, simply because it uses a much, much better H.264 codec. If you are doing large amounts of this work, for a client, it’s a very worthy investment.

    “There’s no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance.”

    Steve Ballmer To USA Today

  • Rich Rubasch

    August 22, 2009 at 4:38 pm

    Ditto on Episode over Compressor for this task.

    Rich Rubasch
    Tilt Media

Viewing 1 - 3 of 3 posts

Log in to reply.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy