Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums DVD Authoring Cinemacraft SP2 Question

  • Cinemacraft SP2 Question

    Posted by Geo Monterosa on November 14, 2007 at 8:36 pm

    I’m going to build a strictly encoding system with Cinemacraft SP2 in mind. Will there be any difference in performance between an Intel Core 2 Duo processor (2.6ghz) or a Intel Core 2 Quad processor (2.6ghz) or (3.0ghz). I have gone on cinemacraft website and there is no mention of quad support, but maybe wondering if they may not of updated their site. Does anyone have this program and shed some light on this? Thank You

    Dave Friend replied 18 years, 5 months ago 6 Members · 9 Replies
  • 9 Replies
  • Noah Kadner

    November 14, 2007 at 9:15 pm

    So far out of date, wonder if it’s worth their price with so many other encoders out there.

    Noah

    Unlock the secrets of the DVX100, Apple Color and now the HVX200!
    https://www.callboxlive.com

  • Eric Pautsch

    November 14, 2007 at 10:20 pm

    This is just my opinion but there is, most definetely, is a distinct difference between the SP and other software encoders. It all depends if you have the cashflow to pay for it. Also depends on how demanding your clients or you are.

  • Geo Monterosa

    November 14, 2007 at 11:05 pm

    Yes, it will be running all day. We have the cashflow for this but we don’t want to be spending more for hardward encoders. I have done comparisons with many software encoders and CCE SP2 looks the best. I just wonder if the new cpu’s will add any performance or if the program will even recognize it.

  • Dave Friend

    November 15, 2007 at 12:24 am

    We run the Basic version quite a lot on a two CPU dual core system. Just a little older than the quad core CPUs. If you look at the Task Manager CCE is clearly using 3 of the cores. So it is definitely written as a multi-threaded app.

    In general it processes at about real time. Sometimes a wee bit faster than real time depending on the codec of the input file. Even at that, task manager seldom shows a CPU utilization above 15%. It usually bounces around the 8% to 12% range.

    I suspect that most of the time goes to disk reads and memory reading/writing and not the actual number crunching that does the encoding.

    One advantage the quad core allows is for CCE to do it’s thing while I use Photoshop or Scenarist to do other work at the same time. Everything appears to run full speed ahead.

    Get the quad core.

    Dave

    Dave Friend
    Co-Host discrete editors COW

  • Geo Monterosa

    November 15, 2007 at 9:42 am

    Thank you friend, i will certainly aim for the quad. 🙂

  • Max Kovalsky

    November 15, 2007 at 3:52 pm

    I agree with Dave — the speed of your drives is as important, if not more than the processing speed. When shopping around for PC, make sure to get one that has a built-in SATA (with at least 4 ports) or SCSI RAID controller. Reading from one stripe and writing to another will boost your performance by as much as 50%, possibly more.

    Max

    Author
    New York
    Area4.tv

  • Noah Kadner

    November 19, 2007 at 4:02 pm

    Wasn’t suggesting it’s not worth the money just that IMHO you get equal or better encoding for less with other encoders.

    Noah

    Unlock the secrets of the DVX100, Apple Color and now the HVX200!
    https://www.callboxlive.com

  • Ryan Jackson

    November 20, 2007 at 7:16 pm

    Sorry to bust in here…looking for my long lost friend, Dave.

    Sincerely,

    Ryan J

    MP Alumni

  • Dave Friend

    November 26, 2007 at 1:07 pm

    Hi Ryan,

    Yes, you found your old friend Dave. What’s an old audio guy doing lurking around a DVD authoring forum? Drop me an email
    davef [at] davefriend[dot]com

    Dave

    Dave Friend
    Co-Host Discrete Edit*ors COW

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy