-
Cinema Tools: Reverse TK of 29.97 DVCAM transfer of 23.98 HDCAM original
Hi everyone,
I’m wondering if someone with knowledge of the internal workings of Cinema Tools can clear something up for me.
We’re going to be taping a feature with the CineAlta F900 at 23.98fps and recording sound with a Sound Devices 744T set to 48kHz and 24fps timecode, 4 channels of WAV mono, and are having unexpected results with the sound with respect to sync in our tests.
The idea was to do our offline on Final Cut Pro at 23.98 (will go into more detail below), relying on Final Cut to do automatic pulldown to the audio. It turns out Final Cut, as expected, IS applying automatic pulldown to the audio as our sequence preset is 23.98 (and all our video is 23.98), but it is as if it has DOUBLE pulldown as the audio is .1% slower than the image. This is probably all because of a perhaps wacky workflow I developed that I wanted to get some feedback on.
At first I though that we must be recording at some other speed, at 48048HzF (48048 stamped as 48kHz) as it didn’t make sense to me that the sound doesn’t need pulldown, either done in ProTools or automatically by Final Cut. But I just checked settings with the sound recordist and he’s recording straight 48kHz and 24fps timecode.
Now I’m pretty sure the problem is we’re having the HDCAM tapes transferred to DVCAM 29.97 for our offline, and the fact we’re doing a reverse TK to 23.98 instead of 24fps in order to produce a CMX3600 that we can use with the original tapes and have QT files that run at the same speed as the 23.98 online (at least in theory).
My logic in developing a workflow using Cinema Tools’ reverse TK feature on material originating from video was the following:
1. We weren’t set up to handle HDCAM on our Final Cut system, so we had to transfer to DVCAM for our offline.
2. Instead of dealing with the conversion to a 24 base timecode that matched the original tapes at the end, and since we had the original HDCAM timecode burned in on our transfers, why not reestablish the original frames and end up with a CMX 3600 with the original tape timecode?
3. In order to do this, why not use Cinema Tools, even though it is not intended for that purpose, and reverse to 23.98 so that we’re at the same speed as the eventual online?Now why did I think reverse TKing to 23.98 would work? I assumed that Cinema Tools, in reversing to 23.98, leaves the speed of the TK (which is also 23.98) alone and simply restores the original frames. Reversing to 24fps, on the other hand, would restore the original frames AND do a pullup in speed, I thought.
But perhaps it does not work that way? Am I somehow doing a pullup to my video by reversing material that’s originally 23.98 and then converted to 29.97 to 23.98?
I can’t think of what else could be happening.
Thanks,
Nayeli