Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy changing picture edit AFTER sound has been mixed (with OMF file)

  • changing picture edit AFTER sound has been mixed (with OMF file)

    Posted by Nicole Chung on December 13, 2010 at 5:30 pm

    I gave my sound editor an OMF export for Final Cut and he did a great job editing and mixing the sound down with music.

    The only problem is now that I’ve rescreened my piece and now I have several requests to change the picture edit (now that people hear the sound differently).

    I generally don’t make picture edits *after* my sound edit, but a few of these picture edits seem like a good idea now.

    I have two/three questions:
    1. Is there a simple way to make this edit that will work with the OMF file that my sound editor has been working with? I really just need to move a couple of shots around…

    For example, should I recut my picture first, then send him an OMF just of the recut section (with the accompanying video file?)

    2. Is it normal these days to do a sound mix WHILE editing picture, because I’ve seen a few web pages that mention this…or is it still normal to lock picture *then* edit the sound?

    Nicole Chung replied 15 years, 7 months ago 4 Members · 11 Replies
  • 11 Replies
  • Nicole Chung

    December 13, 2010 at 6:56 pm

    Okay, that’s what I thought!

    I was reading this post:
    https://digitalfilmmaker.net/dv/features/soundpp/index.html

    “These days the sound edit can happen during a picture edit in the NLE or there can be a separate edit in Pro Tools depending upon the needs of the project.”

  • Michael Gissing

    December 13, 2010 at 7:16 pm

    No it is not normal to do sound post before picture lock but it does happen. We also have to deal with this issue often as I might mix a feature length version of a doco and then have the cutdown for TV with variations for different markets.

    The technique I mostly use is to get an EDL of the original cut and the recut and then use Editrace to do a compare and create a change list –
    https://www.editrace.com/

    If there have been new shots added, then an OMF of just the new material is required. The easiest way to do this is to make new tracks and put the new audio on the new tracks. Turn off all other tracks and make the OMF. OMFs don’t recognise In/Out markers so you can’t use that technique. A new reference quicktime of the whole program is needed so that the reversion can be checked for sync.

    Most important is to talk to your sound post people as they may have their own preferences. Simple changes like swapping a shot can also be done by keeping a note of the shots changed if length remains unaffected. Cutting and pasting multiple audio tracks with mix automation is not trivial. I reversion both pictures and sound and sound is always a much more complex process.

  • Shane Ross

    December 13, 2010 at 7:17 pm

    You’ll have to talk to your mixer. Ask him how much this will mess things. See if you can resend the OMF and have him conform the cut. You need to make changes to the version with your ORIGINAL mix…not the one with the returned audio files.

    Then re-OMF…they reconform and get you new audio stems.

    But talk to your audio guy…not us. THEY will be the ones dealing with it.

    And I ONLY give the audio guy stuff to mix when things are LOCKED. If I am in a rush, I go act by act.

    Shane

    GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
    Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def

  • Nicole Chung

    December 13, 2010 at 7:49 pm

    I literally only need to swap two shots, but I am going to go into my edit later today and take a look (to double check how the swapping of shots affects the surrounding shots)

    Going forward on this – because I would like to be picture-locked the next time – how do I get clear editing feedback *before* a proper sound mix?

    It seems like the sound mix – because it was so good – has really changed people’s perception of the edit…

    Hope this isn’t considered a “bump”

  • Shane Ross

    December 13, 2010 at 8:38 pm

    [nicole chung] “how do I get clear editing feedback *before* a proper sound mix?”

    Make your temp sound mix sound REALLY good. It needs to sound like a full mix. Music, sound effects, broll audio. Everything needs to be mixed by you. You can’t just leave all the adding of sound or adjusting of levels to the audio guy. Your temp mix needs to sound like a full mix.

    [nicole chung] “It seems like the sound mix – because it was so good – has really changed people’s perception of the edit…”

    Which is EXACTLY why you do the full mix yourself.

    Shane

    GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
    Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def

  • Michael Gissing

    December 13, 2010 at 8:42 pm

    Swapping shots without changing length is trivial and should be no problem for anyone. Total recuts and reversioning is the difficult task.

    There is no formula for getting lock off. The skill and experience of editors, directors, producers and often commissioning editors are required and this isn’t something you can control. Fiddles can and do happen after a mix. All that really matters is the changes improve the program.

  • Frank Nolan

    December 13, 2010 at 11:18 pm

    [Michael Gissing] “Swapping shots without changing length is trivial and should be no problem for anyone.”

    Ahhhhh spoken like a true editor.
    Of course that 20 second shot you just swapped out didn’t affect timing at all because the new shot is 20 secs as well, but now it is an exterior scene of a space ship firing lazer guns at the 6 enemy spaceships that are surrounding it and whizzing by at the speed of light, instead of the interior shot of the captain sitting at his desk contemplating which course to take. It’s just trivial and probably not even worth mentioning to the sound editor and mixer:) Of course it’s not a problem to build the sound for a 20sec spaceship dog fight scene but how much extra money do you have?

  • Michael Gissing

    December 13, 2010 at 11:35 pm

    [Frank Nolan] “Ahhhhh spoken like a true editor.”

    I grade, online and sound post. I deal with this sort of thing all the time. Swapping shots means you can swap existing sound elements and not have to ripple automation files as overall timing is unaltered. Compared to major sequence recutting and adding new shots, yes this is trivial.

    Perhaps you mistake swapping two shots in a sequence with replacing two shots with new material.

  • Frank Nolan

    December 13, 2010 at 11:59 pm

    [Michael Gissing] “Perhaps you mistake swapping two shots in a sequence with replacing two shots with new material.

    Quite possible. normally when I hear an editor say “Oh I just swapped out a few shots, the timing is still the same though”, I end up seeing the sort of thing I referred to in the previous post.

  • Michael Gissing

    December 14, 2010 at 12:02 am

    I took Nicole literally

    [nicole chung] “I literally only need to swap two shots”

    I didn’t mean to make out that changes after a mix were trivial. I was speaking relatively.

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy