Activity › Forums › Avid Media Composer › Canon 5D coversion: Apple Prores 422 vs Avid DNxHD
-
Canon 5D coversion: Apple Prores 422 vs Avid DNxHD
Posted by Henning Tveito on June 7, 2011 at 3:58 pmI have loads of footage I need to convert. Based on what I’ve read, there doesn’t seem to be much difference between Apple’s ProRes 422 and Avid’s DNxHD codec.
I guess Avid handles both formats.
Any experiences with this???
Michael Vitacco replied 14 years, 1 month ago 5 Members · 8 Replies -
8 Replies
-
Terence Curren
June 7, 2011 at 5:24 pmAvid does handle both formats, However it handles DNxHD natively and therefore it will be much smoother. You can convert in some programs creating an AAF which allows you to drop the created MXF files into your Avid media folder, then import the AAF and everything relinks. this is the most bulletproof way to wok with media.
Terence Curren
http://www.alphadogs.tv
http://www.digitalservicestation.com
Burbank,Ca -
Markus Schmidt
June 7, 2011 at 5:50 pmMicheal Phillips ansered a similar question I had some time ago
https://forums.creativecow.net/thread/45/878076
grz
mcameras don’t lie yet liars may use cameras
-
Shane Ross
June 7, 2011 at 6:55 pmJust to add to the chorus…both are great codecs. But always convert to the codec that is native to the NLE you are using. DNxHD for Avid, ProRes for FCP.
Editing AMA footage in Avid, especially if you have a lot of it, really slows the machine down. And that’s how you’d have to access the ProRes footage.
Shane
GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def -
Henning Tveito
June 8, 2011 at 12:39 amThanks for all your responses guys!
So, since I’m working in Avid, I should use DNxHD?
All of my other footage is shot with a Panasonic P” in MXF-format. I’ve used “Link to AMA volume” to import all this.
Is that not reccomended if I convert the 5D files?
-
Terence Curren
June 8, 2011 at 12:56 amThe problem with AMA is that it isn’t a solid as the native Avid media management. It’s fine for a quick edit (think news piece), or for viewing footage prior to transcoding. But for anything else, yes, transcode to DNxHD. Your life will be much better.
Terence Curren
http://www.alphadogs.tv
http://www.digitalservicestation.com
Burbank,Ca -
Shane Ross
June 8, 2011 at 1:01 amWell, accessing P2 footage is different. That’s in a DVCPRO HD MXF format. And Avid can deal with that footage natively. Avid media files are MXF, P2 is MXF. It’s all good.
But yes, work in DNxHD.
Shane
GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def -
Henning Tveito
June 8, 2011 at 12:06 pmThanks for all your responses guys, you’ve been very helpful!
Much appreciated 🙂
Take care!
-
Michael Vitacco
April 8, 2012 at 3:44 pmThis thread has been very useful. Thanks you guys. I’m a newbie and have a remedial question regarding this somewhat. I’ve using ProRes files and am experiencing the sluggishness you mentioned and that I’ve been reading about. I’m working on transcoded footage shot on 5D mark iii. If I consolidate to mxf at this point, am I degrading the original footage at all? I’d used the ProRes because at the time I couldn’t get avid to link the the raw mxf files on the drive. I assume it’s because I got a drive from an FCP editor and the original camera file architecture was gone. So I went with all te transcoded media. As I move forward towards delivery for broadcast, I’m just concerned that I’m providing a less-than-ideal final product. Is this a valid concern? I appreciate any help in this!
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up