Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Avid Media Composer Canon 5D coversion: Apple Prores 422 vs Avid DNxHD

  • Canon 5D coversion: Apple Prores 422 vs Avid DNxHD

    Posted by Henning Tveito on June 7, 2011 at 3:58 pm

    I have loads of footage I need to convert. Based on what I’ve read, there doesn’t seem to be much difference between Apple’s ProRes 422 and Avid’s DNxHD codec.

    I guess Avid handles both formats.

    Any experiences with this???

    Michael Vitacco replied 14 years, 1 month ago 5 Members · 8 Replies
  • 8 Replies
  • Terence Curren

    June 7, 2011 at 5:24 pm

    Avid does handle both formats, However it handles DNxHD natively and therefore it will be much smoother. You can convert in some programs creating an AAF which allows you to drop the created MXF files into your Avid media folder, then import the AAF and everything relinks. this is the most bulletproof way to wok with media.

    Terence Curren
    http://www.alphadogs.tv
    http://www.digitalservicestation.com
    Burbank,Ca

  • Markus Schmidt

    June 7, 2011 at 5:50 pm

    Micheal Phillips ansered a similar question I had some time ago
    https://forums.creativecow.net/thread/45/878076
    grz
    m

    cameras don’t lie yet liars may use cameras

  • Shane Ross

    June 7, 2011 at 6:55 pm

    Just to add to the chorus…both are great codecs. But always convert to the codec that is native to the NLE you are using. DNxHD for Avid, ProRes for FCP.

    Editing AMA footage in Avid, especially if you have a lot of it, really slows the machine down. And that’s how you’d have to access the ProRes footage.

    Shane

    GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
    Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def

  • Henning Tveito

    June 8, 2011 at 12:39 am

    Thanks for all your responses guys!

    So, since I’m working in Avid, I should use DNxHD?

    All of my other footage is shot with a Panasonic P” in MXF-format. I’ve used “Link to AMA volume” to import all this.

    Is that not reccomended if I convert the 5D files?

  • Terence Curren

    June 8, 2011 at 12:56 am

    The problem with AMA is that it isn’t a solid as the native Avid media management. It’s fine for a quick edit (think news piece), or for viewing footage prior to transcoding. But for anything else, yes, transcode to DNxHD. Your life will be much better.

    Terence Curren
    http://www.alphadogs.tv
    http://www.digitalservicestation.com
    Burbank,Ca

  • Shane Ross

    June 8, 2011 at 1:01 am

    Well, accessing P2 footage is different. That’s in a DVCPRO HD MXF format. And Avid can deal with that footage natively. Avid media files are MXF, P2 is MXF. It’s all good.

    But yes, work in DNxHD.

    Shane

    GETTING ORGANIZED WITH FINAL CUT PRO DVD…don’t miss it.
    Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def

  • Henning Tveito

    June 8, 2011 at 12:06 pm

    Thanks for all your responses guys, you’ve been very helpful!

    Much appreciated 🙂

    Take care!

  • Michael Vitacco

    April 8, 2012 at 3:44 pm

    This thread has been very useful. Thanks you guys. I’m a newbie and have a remedial question regarding this somewhat. I’ve using ProRes files and am experiencing the sluggishness you mentioned and that I’ve been reading about. I’m working on transcoded footage shot on 5D mark iii. If I consolidate to mxf at this point, am I degrading the original footage at all? I’d used the ProRes because at the time I couldn’t get avid to link the the raw mxf files on the drive. I assume it’s because I got a drive from an FCP editor and the original camera file architecture was gone. So I went with all te transcoded media. As I move forward towards delivery for broadcast, I’m just concerned that I’m providing a less-than-ideal final product. Is this a valid concern? I appreciate any help in this!

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy