Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Storage & Archiving Can we go back to XAVC S for archiving? For example

  • Can we go back to XAVC S for archiving? For example

    Posted by Robert Withers on January 16, 2019 at 6:33 pm

    Hi all,
    My Sony RX10 generates XAVC S files in mp4 (was mxf) that can have 4k and maybe 10 bit. I convert to ProRes for editing, which makes much bigger files. Is it possible to transcode a show back to something like XAVC S for archiving only not editing?

    Or another camera format that would keep as much quality as the ProRes with smaller files?

    I realize most camera files are probably proprietary.

    Is this a dumb question?

    Thanks,
    Robert

    Robert Withers

    Independent/personal/avant-garde cinema, New York City

    Robert Withers replied 7 years, 4 months ago 2 Members · 2 Replies
  • 2 Replies
  • David Roth weiss

    January 17, 2019 at 12:01 am

    Not if you want a high-resolution master for duplication, further editing, etc. Don’t confuse camera original “acquisition” codecs with editing codecs, they are, in most cases, simply very different beasts.

    David Roth Weiss
    Director/Editor/Colorist & Workflow Consultant
    David Weiss Productions
    Los Angeles

    David is a Creative COW contributing editor and a forum host of the Apple Final Cut Pro forum.

  • Robert Withers

    January 17, 2019 at 6:00 pm

    Thanks, David. I don’t “think” I’m confused about the beasts. Though I don’t know much about camera codecs except Long GOP. But my question is could one archive in a smaller camera format which seems to have contained all the quality we wanted to use in the editing format–ie, “back-converting” to a codec with a smaller file size. Your suggestion seems to be that converting to a camera format would then require another re-transcoding back to editing format for further any duplication and additional editing. I suppose, except maybe for those apps like Premiere that claim to work directly with camera formats. I imagine something could be lost in those double transcodings.

    Robert Withers

    Independent/personal/avant-garde cinema, New York City

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy