-
Camera Track vs Motion track
I was till now using Motion tracking to track particularly point in a footage and attach Text/Object to it.
Lately tried camera tracker, did same thing, but the results were more smoother than motion track.
So what i conclude is, camera tracker can be used in place of motion track but not vice vera.
-
2 Replies
-
[Mit Panchani] “So what i conclude is, camera tracker can be used in place of motion track but not vice vera.”
Not necessarily.
Motion tracking yields a 2D motion path that describes the apparent movement of an object in the 2D comp space.
Camera tracking yields a 3D motion path that translates the motion of the camera from the real world to Ae’s 3D space.
Camera tracking is useful as a replacement for motion tracking when the camera moves but the object is static. If both the camera and the object are moving, camera tracking won’t give you a good point to use.
Walter Soyka
Designer & Mad Scientist at Keen Live [link]
Motion Graphics, Widescreen Events, Presentation Design, and Consulting
@keenlive | RenderBreak [blog] | Profile [LinkedIn] -
Thanks, now got the complete idea.
Static object, camera track
moving object, motion track
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up