Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy Bohemian Rhapsody

  • Bohemian Rhapsody

    Posted by Iain Mackinnon on May 13, 2008 at 11:04 am

    Hi there, does anyone know how to achieve the visual feedback effect as used in Queen’s Bohemian Rhapsody? We’re doing a recreation and i’m buggered if i can find it. also what’s the best way to achieve honeycomb effect as well? sorry if I sound stupid but everything i’ve tried takes much too long or simply doesn’t work.
    I’m using FCP4 HD filming in mini DV. considering it’s only about 80secs of footage i thought it’d be easy. WRONG!

    Dylan Reeve replied 18 years ago 3 Members · 7 Replies
  • 7 Replies
  • Bouncing Account needs new email address

    May 13, 2008 at 11:29 am

    Shoot a monitor connected to the camera’s output.

    The camera’s output would be combined (video switcher) with anything else you wanted on the screen (keyed or dissolve-mixed.)

  • Iain Mackinnon

    May 13, 2008 at 11:57 am

    So let me get this, Camera 1 is pointing at my subject, output to a monitor, camera 2 is pointing at the monitor.
    Is that right? then combine the 2 images in FCP?

  • Bouncing Account needs new email address

    May 13, 2008 at 12:06 pm

    [Iain MacKinnon] “So let me get this, Camera 1 is pointing at my subject, output to a monitor, camera 2 is pointing at the monitor.
    Is that right? then combine the 2 images in FCP?

    Nope.

    Cam 1: Subject
    Cam 2: Monitor

    ON the monitor is a LIVE combination (via a video switcher) of Cam 1 -AND- Cam 2.

    BTW, the Cam 1 (subject) shot can be a video tape, but Cam 2 and the monitor must be “live.”

  • Iain Mackinnon

    May 13, 2008 at 12:09 pm

    Aha! Cheers mucker! i’ll get right on to it. Muchos gracias and all that jazz! BY the way, any idea how to reduce my rendering time? 2 hours for 47 secs of video! Eek!

    I used to spend my time wondering, now it’s all used up rendering.

  • [Iain MacKinnon] “any idea how to reduce my rendering time? 2 hours for 47 secs of video! Eek!”

    “FCP4 HD filming in mini DV”

    Mac?
    Speed?
    Drives?
    Timeline specs?

  • Iain Mackinnon

    May 13, 2008 at 5:15 pm

    Power MAc G5,
    Not sure of speed,
    Timeline specs? not sure i get you on that one.
    Pretend i’m 5 years old here will you? cheers.

    I used to spend my time wondering, now it’s all used up rendering.

  • Dylan Reeve

    May 15, 2008 at 9:37 am

    Great. I’ll be singing that all night now. At least it’s displaced the songs from the music doco I was working on earlier today.

    The honeycomb thing is a physical glass lens. I believe you can get them (I know they exist for still photography).

    The video feedback thing is a bit tricky I reckon. First of all, I think the video was shot on film and the feedback effect has been added as a optical later (it actually superimposes slightly over Freddie’s face at the beginning, not behind it).

    So I think they did this – shot the singing heads clean against black. Then had the shots transferred to video to shoot the element for the feedback. Then a video camera (connected through a switcher to a monitor) was positioned next to a film camera, both pointed at a large TV monitor.

    To start the feedback, the video of Freddie is switched to the monitor, along with the signal from the camera. The trick would be in how they were mixed to the monitor – a linear luma key of the filmed element in the foreground with the camera feed in the background would be my bet.

    Anyway, the video feedback loop is filmed with the film camera and then recombined on top of the original singing closeup to form the finished shot.

    That sort of look it nearly impossible to create artificially, the way to get it is to actually film a screen.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy