Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

  • Walter Biscardi

    July 7, 2010 at 7:03 pm

    We have been doing MPEG-2’s for BluRay discs for three or four years now. They look pretty much identical to the ProRes originals when played back.

    Walter Biscardi, Jr.
    Editor, Colorist, Director, Writer, Consultant, Author, Chef.
    HD Post and Production
    Biscardi Creative Media

    “Foul Water, Fiery Serpent” featuring Sigourney Weaver coming soon.

    Blog Twitter Facebook

  • Chris Borjis

    July 7, 2010 at 9:19 pm

    another vote for mpeg2.

    faster to encode than h.264 and looks great.

  • Steve Eisen

    July 8, 2010 at 2:56 am

    I’ll take the other side and say that I encode using h.264 with the Matrox Compress HD Card. Encode times are lighting fast and the quality is excellent.

    The Compress HD card is a great investment.

    Steve Eisen
    Eisen Video Productions
    Vice President
    Chicago Final Cut Pro Users Group

  • Eric Pautsch

    July 8, 2010 at 10:53 am

    However the Matrox does not output a compliant H.264 stream for replication. Fine for one offs but that’s it.

  • Deleted User

    July 8, 2010 at 9:28 pm

    Would you mind elaborting on why it’s not compliant? I am considering the MX02 with the Max option and would be interested in the answer.

    Lee
    SAMDOG Digital Post

  • Eric Pautsch

    July 10, 2010 at 3:58 am

    It fails Sony BD verifiers. Im not engineer so I cant elaborate on the technical details.

    https://www.netblender.com/main/resources/wikipapers/blu-ray-encoding/

    This wiki is getting old so maybe things have changed

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy