Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums VEGAS Pro blackmagic cinema camera

  • Angelo Mike

    May 13, 2012 at 3:32 pm

    I’m not sure, though I would guess so. However, I don’t know why most videographers would want this camera since I hear that low light performance is not good, for one thing. Far more importantly, Raw video means many, many times more storage needs than what you have with any other camera. You’ll be spending many thousands on hard drives and arrays for a few hours of footage on that camera.

    http://www.scenethroughglass.com

  • Lance Bachelder

    May 13, 2012 at 5:22 pm

    The Blackmagic Cinema Camera is going to be a HUGE seller (it was already back-ordeded over 1,000 units during NAB) so I would imagine there will be a way to cut the RAW shots in Vegas – though like Angelo says the files will be huge. I would think it you’d want to transcode the files into something Vegas friendly for editing since the files will have a non-standard frame size in RAW mode. Of course you can shoot in 1080p in either ProRES or DNxHD and Vegas can read both formats.

    I think the low-light performance looks really good with the camera and more like an Alexa or RED than a current DSLR. This means if you know how to shoot and light a scene you’ll get great results – if you want to shoot scenes in dark alleys with no added lights this camera and maybe this industry may not be for you 🙂

    Lance Bachelder
    Writer, Editor, Director
    Irvine, California

  • Steve Rhoden

    May 13, 2012 at 8:24 pm

    Yes, Vegas suppose to can handle that camera’s format well.

    Steve Rhoden
    (Cow Leader)
    Film Editor & Compositor.
    Filmex Creative Media.
    1-876-832-4956

  • Angelo Mike

    May 13, 2012 at 8:58 pm

    Here are the data rates for RAW-1.46 TB per hour. Double that to back everything up, which you absolutely should do, without question. So get ready to spend a few hundred dollars for every hour you shoot, despite the camera itself being pretty inexpensive.

  • Stephen Mann

    May 15, 2012 at 4:14 pm

    [Angelo Mike] ” despite the camera itself being pretty inexpensive.”

    The cost of a single lens could easily double the startup cost.

    Steve Mann
    MannMade Digital Video
    http://www.mmdv.com

  • Neal Tate

    June 1, 2012 at 2:58 am

    Just because it can shoot RAW, that doesn’t mean that’s all I would shoot in.

    Gravitate Media Group (GMG)
    gravitatemediagroup@gmail.com
    http://www.youtube.com/gravitatemediagroup

  • Bob Mark

    October 6, 2012 at 3:18 pm

    I’m looking at that camera too, but when you add everything you will need, it gets up there in price pretty fast. The GH2 has been pretty amazing for the price. The GH3 is on the way, $1300 body only. https://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/09/17/Panasonic-announces-DMC-GH3-high-end-movie-focused-mirrorless-camera

    Bob

  • Jason Gazy

    February 22, 2013 at 2:41 pm

    if your shooting a film or working commercially why would it matter the storage space? if your an event video guy then this is not the tool you would use. plus it shoots in two HD codecs one being the prores for all the mac nuts. but vegas pro can handle all these files. but just like the camera be sure your hardware on your editor is up to the job you are using it for. use the proper tool for the job. not a hard science.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy