Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Compression Techniques BitVise MPEG-2 compressor worth it?

  • BitVise MPEG-2 compressor worth it?

    Posted by Paul Ravillino on April 5, 2010 at 11:37 pm

    Hello,

    I have a post 2 spots below describing my problem in detail…

    In short, my MPEG-2 files that come out of Compressor are just not acceptable to me. They look very pixelated.

    Is this BitVise MPEG compressor that much better? Are there other people out there who’ve had the same problems with Compressor and made the switch?

    Thanks.

    Mark Luigjes replied 16 years, 1 month ago 3 Members · 2 Replies
  • 2 Replies
  • Rich Rubasch

    April 6, 2010 at 12:54 am

    We run compressor at 6.3 mbps CBR for pretty much everything. We use Bitvice exclusively for situations where we have to put more than 2 hours of video on a DVD and it needs that extra special handling. But the fact that compressor is a one-stop shop for the MPEG and AC3 is a real timesaver. For most of what we encode it is fine. If you are encoding live bands with lots of swishing lights and movement I can see Bitvice being valuable. For most industrials I think compressor would be enough.

    Bit Vice is a capable encoder that could use a workflow and interface upgrade.

    Rich Rubasch
    Tilt Media Inc.
    Video Production and Post
    Owner/President/Editor/Designer/Animator
    https://www.tiltmedia.com

  • Mark Luigjes

    April 12, 2010 at 12:21 pm

    We use Bitvice for every dvd we make. It’s very reliable if you know some of the advanced encoding options. I believe does a great job in what it’s supposed to.

    For AC3 audio we use Compressor, so Rich is right regarding the work flow issue. But we still think the quality of Bitvice is worth the effort.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy