Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Adobe After Effects Best tracking markers?

  • Best tracking markers?

    Posted by Jack Kelly on November 17, 2005 at 6:17 pm

    Hi Creative Cow’ers,

    What makes the best tracking point? Do little red, sticky dots do it for you? Or do you use something a bit more high-tech?!

    In particular: I’m planning a shoot in an art gallery and we want to be able to track the corners of some of the photos on the walls so we can superimpose video into the picture frames. How would you ensure that you got robust tracking points from this shoot?

    We’re thinking of using four little red dots, one in each corner of the picture frame. Is that a good idea? Of course, we’ll ensure that the dots are large enough so they always occupy at least 4 pixels.

    Is red the best colour? Would green / blue be better? (We’re doing tests on miniDV and we’re planning to shoot on either DigiBeta or HDV).

    Thanks,
    Jack

    ====================
    Jack Kelly
    London
    Dir / Prod / Camera
    ====================

    Steve Roberts replied 20 years, 5 months ago 6 Members · 9 Replies
  • 9 Replies
  • Tony Kloiber

    November 17, 2005 at 7:03 pm

    In AE your choices are RGB, Luminance or Saturation, whatever you feel is going to get you the best separation from the background and your markers would obviously be the choice. Other tracking software maybe able to use a particular channel. Are the walls white and are the frames all black then maybe you can just use the frame’s corners as the track points. If your able to use the frames then you don’t have to remove the tracking dots. If they don’t mind you putting stickers on the art then put black and white makers in the inside corners of the frame then your replacement art will cover the markers.

    TonyTony

  • Jack Kelly

    November 17, 2005 at 7:13 pm

    Thanks for the reply. To be honest, we haven’t secured the “gallery” location yet so we’re not entirely sure what the frames will look like. We’ve been doing some tests with frames in our own flats and the tracking can be a bit hit-and-miss for a variety of reasons… so we were thinking of using some coloured dots to see if they track better.

    Thanks,
    Jack

    ====================
    Jack Kelly
    London
    Dir / Prod / Camera
    ====================

  • Greg Neumayer

    November 18, 2005 at 2:49 am

    I’d say use anything that gives you good contrast for your tracker. You don’t necessarily need to track the actual frame or art, if marring is an issue. As long as you’re tracking relative to the frame (i.e. trackers on the wall near the frame) it would seem like you’d be good to go.

    Now, this is totally presumptious of me, but once you put your image into the hole, make sure you take the time to match lighting, etc. of your filled element so it really looks integrated. We’ve all seen way too many video shots just slapped up on a billboard with no thought to the atmospherics. (not that a Creative Cow’er would do that!)

    -Greg

    Antifreeze Design
    https://www.antifreezemotiongraphics.com

  • Chris Smith

    November 18, 2005 at 3:17 pm

    Why red out of curiousity? I know sometimes they will do orange trackers when on a green/blue screen. But for everyday use, like the others say, just get good contrast. In most situations ppl track by luminance. So assuming the pictures are dark, white dots do very well. However I’d like to say the easiest solution is probably to track the outside corners of the picture frame itself. No markers to add or digitaly remove.

    If your pictures are behind glass by chance, remeber to try and isolate the sheen and comp it back on top of the picture you added in for extra realism.

    Chris Smith
    https://www.sugarfilmproduction.com

  • Steve Roberts

    November 18, 2005 at 3:36 pm

    [Chris Smith] “I’d like to say the easiest solution is probably to track the outside corners of the picture frame itself. No markers to add or digitaly remove.”

    I agree. The sharp corners should also be easier to track than dots. In case you get closer at some point, dots can become difficult to track, but sharp corners are still sharp. Ad infinitum, to a degree.

    Steve

  • Jack Kelly

    November 18, 2005 at 3:52 pm

    Hi guys,

    Thanks for all your excellent advice!

    Let’s change the brief a little bit… say we find a gallery space that has completely blank, white walls and our job is to place four tracking points on this white wall. In other words, we have complete freedom as to what we use as tracking points. What would make the best tracking points?

    We’ve already established that high-contrast between the background and the tracking point is essential. But what shape would be best? A cross? A dot? A square?

    Thanks,
    Jack

    ====================
    Jack Kelly
    London
    Dir / Prod / Camera
    ====================

  • Steve Roberts

    November 18, 2005 at 3:56 pm

    Some prefer chevrons ( < > V L ) for the sharp corners.

    Steve

  • Chiauran

    November 18, 2005 at 5:21 pm

    *Some prefer chevrons ( < > V L ) for the sharp corners.

    Hi, I’m new to tracking. Why does <>VL shape is good as a marker for corner? Does AE read <>VL shape easier?

    chiauran

  • Steve Roberts

    November 18, 2005 at 5:32 pm

    It’s just that as you close in on a dot, it becomes a circle, and it’s harder to find a small point to track. If you’re far away, a dot is fine.

    It’s easier for trackers to find sharp points on corners. Squares and X’s should be fine as well.

    If you’re keen, check out Matchmoving: The Invisible Art of Camera Tracking by Dobbert.

    Steve

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy