Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity › Forums › Adobe Premiere Pro › Best path for scaling down Prores HQ to Mpeg2 files for DVD

  • Best path for scaling down Prores HQ to Mpeg2 files for DVD

    Posted by Matt Stoddart on October 29, 2012 at 2:10 pm

    I have always gone one route when encoding ProRes HQ 1920×1080 files to Mpeg2 720×576 for use in Encore.

    1) Create a new sequence in Premiere CS5 (DV widescreen 48k),drop the ProRes file on to the timeline and reduce the scale by 55%, then render out with both “Render at max depth/scaling” ticked.
    I’m please with the end results, usually 18 hours later on a 90min film, but in the search to reducing any aliasing in the usual shots (blinds, french sweaters etc) should I go a difference route?

    Does anyone place the HD file on a HD timeline and render straight from that just using the output cropping tool to elimate the pillarboxing?

    Thanks in advance.

    Matt Stoddart replied 13 years, 11 months ago 3 Members · 5 Replies
  • 5 Replies
  • Kris Merkel

    October 29, 2012 at 2:30 pm

    Is there any reason why you do not want Adobe Media encoder to do the heavy lifting (Compression) for the PAL DVD MPEG-2 files?

    “Think of everything in terms of building capacity.”

    Kris Merkel
    twitter: @kris_merkel
    Product Manager, Flanders Scientific Inc.
    http://www.shopfsi.com
    Co-Founder, Atlanta Cutters Post Production User Group
    http://www.atlantacutters.com

    2.2Ghz MBP core i7
    16Gb RAM
    CS 5.5
    FCP7 and Studio
    Blackmagic Design UltraStudio 3D
    AJA IO XT
    FSI LM-2340W



  • Matt Stoddart

    October 29, 2012 at 2:51 pm

    Thanks Kris,

    I do let AME do all the heavy lifting, I just use Premiere to scale it down and do any 24 to 25fps adjustments I need to before sending it to the queue in AME.

    Cheers
    Matt

  • Kris Merkel

    October 29, 2012 at 3:12 pm

    You might see better spatial results if you do the scaling in AME as part of the encode. As far as speed increases I couldn’t say one way or another because this is not a workflow that I use. I do however always let the encoding tool, AME, Compressor, Episode ect do the scaling of the final output.

    “Think of everything in terms of building capacity.”

    Kris Merkel
    twitter: @kris_merkel
    Product Manager, Flanders Scientific Inc.
    http://www.shopfsi.com
    Co-Founder, Atlanta Cutters Post Production User Group
    http://www.atlantacutters.com

    2.2Ghz MBP core i7
    16Gb RAM
    CS 5.5
    FCP7 and Studio
    Blackmagic Design UltraStudio 3D
    AJA IO XT
    FSI LM-2340W



  • Mike Squires

    October 29, 2012 at 9:57 pm

    Why not send your HD sequence straight to Encore (via Dynamic Link)? This will use AME to do the scaling.

  • Matt Stoddart

    October 29, 2012 at 10:27 pm

    You still have to crop the top/bottom of a 1920×1080 frame to get a 720×576 (1.46)frame without any pillarboxing, 15 top and bottom in the crop function on the source/encode window seems to do the trick.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy