Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Avid Media Composer Avid 2:1 vs Digibeta 2:1

  • Avid 2:1 vs Digibeta 2:1

    Posted by Daniel Edelman on September 4, 2009 at 3:33 am

    I need some clarification:
    When I send a 2:1 sequence (via digital cut) to a Digibeta deck, does the video data stay the same, or does the deck do an additional 2:1 compression?

    Daniel Edelman replied 16 years, 8 months ago 3 Members · 4 Replies
  • 4 Replies
  • Job Ter burg

    September 4, 2009 at 7:39 am

    DigiBeta is slightly more compressed than 2:1.
    What happens is that the 2:1 footage is played back (decompressed) over SDI into the DigiBeta deck, which in turn compresses it with its own proprietary codec. So yes, compared to the original, compression is applied twice.

  • Daniel Edelman

    September 4, 2009 at 2:04 pm

    Thanks for the info. This questions spurred from a discussion about how to decide proper capture settings based on final output. I usually make the decision based on bitrate. Eg: We upres to DNxHD 145 because we output to HDCAM, which is 144 Mb/s. Is using the bitrate a good way to decide which codecs to use?

    The Goods: Avid MC 2.2.15 Adrenaline, Symphony Nitris 1.6.5, Unity 3.5. HP xw8200 turn-key computers. AJ-HD1400, 1200, HDW-1800, HDW-F500, DVW-A500

  • Bouke Vahl

    September 8, 2009 at 7:46 am

    Bitrate and quality have a very strange relation.
    The noisier the original, the higher the bitrate must go to have good results.
    Next there are the different codecs. MpegII based codecs give great results on very low datarates, and the I frame only variants are easy to work with.
    There is (a bit) of consensus that recompression to the same or alike codec yields the best results. But that is theoretical.
    If you can, (that is, probably not with HDV or H264 material), use the native codec as long as you can. It is fast (no recompression) and storage efficient.
    For going from digibeta to HD-cam, i would think that the scaling applied is more important than the datarate. Do test a lot of options, and let your eyes decide.

    Bouke

    https://www.videotoolshed.com/
    smart tools for video pro’s

  • Daniel Edelman

    September 9, 2009 at 4:09 pm

    Thanks for the insight.
    At my job i’m regularly presented with a myriad of tapes which need to make it into Avid. It’s usually on a large scale, so there is no room for error (like digitizing 50 tapes at a sub-par resolution).My main goal here is create a rule of thumb that will help me decided what’s the best resolution to use depending on the source and final master tapes. I know it’s not so cut and dry, but any guidance is greatly appreciated.

    The Goods: Avid MC 2.2.15 Adrenaline, Symphony Nitris 1.6.5, Unity 3.5. HP xw8200 turn-key computers. AJ-HD1400, 1200, HDW-1800, HDW-F500, DVW-A500

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy