Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Panasonic Cameras AVC-Intra codec

  • Lars Wikstrom

    December 22, 2006 at 6:48 pm

    I have a question about that too. The AVC is the same as the H.264, is it not? It looks nice but it is highly compressed. It can’t compare to the DVCPRO codec for capture can it?

    -Lars

  • Barry Green

    December 22, 2006 at 8:03 pm

    The HVX200 itself can’t use any AVC codec. They’d have to make a new model that either incorporated an AVC/h.264 compression card in it, or allowed it to work with the optional AVC-Intra codec board that they’re marketing for the “big” cameras.

    —————–
    Get the most from your DVX camera. The DVX Book and DVX DVD are now available on ebay and at Amazon (https://www.fiftv.com/db)

  • Lars Wikstrom

    December 23, 2006 at 1:09 am

    What is the major benifit of using this codec? With heavy compression I would not use it for green screening.Also isn’t the H264 codec part of the Mpeg family?

    Is that a better format then the DVCPRO codec?

    -Lars

  • Peter Corbett

    December 23, 2006 at 6:51 am

    It’s not heavy compression. It will be 100mbs on the HPX2100 and will look fantastic up against DVCPROHD.

    Peter Corbett
    Powerhouse Productions
    Australia
    http://www.php.com.au

  • Lars Wikstrom

    December 23, 2006 at 11:57 pm

    if AVC is H264 then it is a heavy compressed coedec. Hands down the image looks awasome that h264 makes and the file sizes are mind blowing for the results. I will be curious what 100mbs will look like since it can get images that are very small and look great.

    -Lars

  • Peter Corbett

    December 24, 2006 at 12:13 am

    Panasonic’s AVC-Intra is intra-frame H.264 compression so there is no long-GOP and is also recordable to 10-bit in the camera. At 50mbs you get DVCPROHD qaulity at half the data space of DVCPROHD. Based upon our tests with 100mbit H.264, compression artifacts are virtually non-existant. Sure H.264 at 2mbs or 5mbs is “highly compressed” but 100mbs is not highly compressed. The opposite in fact.

    Peter

    Peter Corbett
    Powerhouse Productions
    Australia
    http://www.php.com.au

  • Lars Wikstrom

    December 24, 2006 at 2:20 am

    ahhh, I see, Intresting. I wonder what the benfits would be to intraframe H264? It seems like you would loose the befefits of H264 since the codec is normaly a GOP codec. I would be intreseted in seeing some clips shot with this codec.

    -lars

  • Arnie Schlissel

    December 24, 2006 at 4:37 am

    It’s basically the same benefits that you get with Sony’s IMX codecs. Intra-frame means compression within a single frame. Inter-frame means compression between several frames, IOW a group of pictures.

    Arnie
    Now in post: Peristroika, a film by Slava Tsukerman
    https://www.arniepix.com/blog

  • Peter Corbett

    December 25, 2006 at 6:02 am

    Trust me. In 10-bit 100mbs, the quality is mind-blowing. Also look for Grass Valley’s Infinity with 100mbs JPEG2000 intra-frame compression. I have real doubts about the longevity of Sony’s HDV/XDCAM HD long-GOP methodology.

    Peter

    Peter Corbett
    Powerhouse Productions
    Australia
    http://www.php.com.au

  • Stevenbradford

    December 26, 2006 at 5:53 pm

    You should have doubts. It’s entirely based on Memory being very very expensive. Otherwise, why would you use it? Every other application has stopped using heavy compression for origination, still photography, audio, etc.

    Remember Stacker and the other utilities for saving hard drive space on a PC by compressing standard wp and other data files? When was the last time anyone used one of those programs?

    Steven Bradford
    School of Film, Video, Visual Effects
    Collins College
    Tempe Arizona

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy