Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy Apple pro res vs. Apple pro res (HQ)

  • Apple pro res vs. Apple pro res (HQ)

    Posted by Steve Cohen on May 20, 2009 at 3:58 pm

    Whats the difference and how much of a difference is there. Is it worth using (HQ).

    We digitize, edit and output in 8bit Uncompressed, I was thinking of changing to ProRes to save space, but don’t want to lose quality.

    We have 3 G5 Power PC’s (quad core) and 2 Intel Octocore systems, all have 8GB of Ram. I read that you can only do ProRes on an intel system. Is that true?

    Thanks.

    Steve Cohen
    Senior Editor
    O2 Media Inc.

    Eric Sternberger replied 16 years, 12 months ago 5 Members · 11 Replies
  • 11 Replies
  • Jeremy Garchow

    May 20, 2009 at 4:15 pm

    What’s your srouce footage?

    HD or SD?

    https://support.apple.com/kb/TA24757

    Jeremy

  • Steve Cohen

    May 20, 2009 at 4:22 pm

    Right now everything is SD.
    Either Beta SP, D9, or Mini DV.

    Steve Cohen
    Senior Editor
    O2 Media Inc.

  • Steve Cohen

    May 20, 2009 at 4:37 pm

    [Steve Cohen] “Right now everything is SD.
    Either Beta SP, D9, or Mini DV.”

    Forgot to mention we are capturing via a BalckMagic MultiBridge Extreme or Pro.

    Steve Cohen
    Senior Editor
    O2 Media Inc.

  • Jeremy Garchow

    May 20, 2009 at 4:37 pm

    Well, the link specifically says that you can’t capture HD without at least a G5 Quad. SD MIGHT work but your mileage may vary.

    For SD, just go ProRes and not HQ.

    Jeremy

  • Steve Cohen

    May 20, 2009 at 5:22 pm

    Thanks Jeremy;

    We are using a G5 Quad connected to a Fiber San to do our capturing. I think I may test it out and see how things go,

    Steve Cohen
    Senior Editor
    O2 Media Inc.

  • Jeremy Garchow

    May 20, 2009 at 5:32 pm

    Break a leg!

  • Devin Crane

    May 20, 2009 at 6:05 pm

    We have not used Pro Res but have been editing in the IMX 50 codec for the past 4 years and can hardly tell the difference between it and uncompressed. You have to look hard to notice just a little bit more noise compared to Uncompressed 10bit. It’s an HQ Mpeg 2 format which will be easier on your processors than Pro Res which is a variant of H.264. It’s also an I-frame only which means frame to frame no P frames or B frames. Not sure Pro Res is the same, I could be wrong.

  • Steve Cohen

    May 20, 2009 at 6:16 pm

    Thanks I’ll capture a clip at a couple of different codecs and then compare them side by side and see.

    Steve Cohen
    Senior Editor
    O2 Media Inc.

  • Gary Adcock

    May 20, 2009 at 10:27 pm

    [Devin Crane] “t’s an HQ Mpeg 2 format which will be easier on your processors than Pro Res which is a variant of H.264. It’s also an I-frame only which means frame to frame no P frames or B frames. Not sure Pro Res is the same, I could be wrong.”

    Devin,

    Apple’s ProRes codec is a 10bit, full raster (ie: full frame geometry) discrete cosine transform (DCT) based compression algorithm. ProRes is an I-Frame codec and was designed specifically to be the highest quality intermediate codec for the post-production workflows that handles the data at the highest 10bit quality.

    gary adcock
    Studio37
    HD & Film Consultation
    Post and Production Workflows

    Check out
    https://www.aja.com/kiprotour/

    Inside look at the IoHD
    https://library.creativecow.net/articles/adcock_gary/AJAIOHD.php

  • Devin Crane

    May 21, 2009 at 12:46 am

    Your right, I thought I had read somewhere that it was a variant of H.264, but it’s not.

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy